Laserfiche WebLink
In response to a question by Chair Cooper relating to the need for separate addresses for the units, <br />Mr. Iserson noted that it would only be necessary if it were used as a rental unit. <br />PUBLIC HEARING WAS OPENED <br />Norman Soares, Standard Pacific, 3825 Hopyard, Suite 195, represented the applicant. He stated that <br />he is in agreement with the staff report and all conditions of approval. <br />PUBLIC HEARING WAS CLOSED <br />Commissioner Roberts commented that since the proposed units would be so intimately integrated into <br />the main home, she does not feel the owners would rent out the units to unknown persons. She feels <br />they would be used mainly for a nanny, parents, or older children of the owners. <br />Commissioner Sullivan expressed concern with approving the application until the pending ordinance <br />is approved. He also expressed concern with the potential increase in traffic on Foothill Road caused <br />by these units. In addition, he noted that the subject homes are adjacent to the urban growth boundary <br />line, and the General Plan encourages lower density uses adjacent to that boundary. He feels that the <br />existing development is too high in intensity adjacent to the urban growth boundary line, and that <br />adding the secondary units would just make that problem worse. He also commented that the <br />development has already been approved without the secondary units. Finally, Commissioner Sullivan <br />stated that since Oak Tree Farms is such a small development, he feels that all property owners should <br />have <br />been included in the public notice. <br />Commissioner Maas stated that she was in support of the application, although she suggested asking <br />the builder to trellis the secondary unit parking space next to the garage. <br />Commissioner Kumaran stated that since the application meets all State guidelines and since the <br />conditions are so well defined, he is in support of the application. He also explained to Commissioner <br />Sullivan the reasons for the Commission directing staff to draft an ordinance relating to secondary use <br />permits. <br />Chair Cooper stated that he somewhat agrees that the proposed units would have a very minimal <br />impact on density, although he does not feel that warrants a denial of the application since it's only <br />two units and they serve a good function. He, therefore, supported staff's recommendations and <br />conditions of approval. <br />A motion was made by Commissioner Kumaran, seconded by Commissioner Maas, <br />recommending approval of UP-98-11, subject to the separate conditions of approval for each <br />respective residence. <br />Planning Commission Minutes Page 4 May 13, 1998 <br />