My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
PC 03/11/1998
City of Pleasanton
>
BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS
>
PLANNING
>
MINUTES
>
1990-1999
>
1998
>
PC 03/11/1998
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/16/2017 3:58:33 PM
Creation date
10/7/2008 9:05:13 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
MINUTES
DOCUMENT DATE
3/11/1998
DOCUMENT NAME
03/11/1998
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
20
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
be the first priority of any study since that situation was created first. She said the 210 property <br />owners in Danbury Park should be proportionately represented in any east side study." <br />Carol Varela, 3858 Mohr Avenue, amended page 2, paragraph 5, sentence 2, to read as follows: <br />"She stated that while the notices comply with the law, they lack detail and are not clear to the <br />average citizen of Pleasanton. This not only adds confusion, but angers residents when they find <br />out items do concern them." <br />3. MEETING OPEN FOR ANY MEMBER OF THE AUDIENCE TO ADDRESS THE <br />PLANNING COMMISSION ON ANY ITEM WHICH IS NOT ALREADY ON THE <br />AGENDA <br />Carol Varela, 3858 Mohr Avenue, stated that at the last meeting there was a direction to staff <br />that she would be working with staff to ensure that public notices are clear to the public. She <br />contacted staff to find out what she should do to get involved. In response, a message was left <br />on her answering machine on Friday, February 20, informing her that the notice had already <br />been completed. A copy was faxed to her later that day. Upon reviewing it, she found that it <br />was more unsatisfactory than the previous notice. She specifically noted that it did not mention <br />the Busch or Staples properties. She, therefore, contacted Chair Cooper with her comments and <br />asked whether staff could wait until at least Monday before the notices were printed so she could <br />- work with staff on the language. She expressed her disappointment that she never received a <br />return call and that she never had any involvement with staff in preparing the notice. Chair <br />Cooper apologized and stated that it was his understanding that she would be allowed to work <br />with staff on the notice. He also stated that after he spoke with her, he contacted staff and was <br />told that the language relating to Busch and Staples would be included in the notice. Ms. Varela <br />stated that as of today she has yet to review a copy of the revised notice. <br />4. REVISIONS AND OMISSIONS TO THE AGENDA <br />Mr. Iserson noted that Item 6.c, PUD-98-O1, has been continued to the March 25, 1998, <br />meeting. <br />5. MATTERS CONTINUED FOR DECISION <br />There were none. <br />6. PUBLIC HEARINGS <br />a. UP-98-06. Bonnie Lindsev/BAB's (Bonnie's at the Barn) <br />Application for conditional us permit approval to operate a second hand store in an <br />existing 973-square foot retail space located at 200 Ray Street. Zoning for the property is <br />C-C (Central Commercial) District, Downtown Revitalization Overlay District. <br />Planning Commission Page 3 March 11, 1998 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.