PC 02/11/1998 - Laserfiche WebLink

With regard to parking spaces, Mr. Iserson stated that 321 spaces have been proposed, which exceeds the amount of spaces required by the Hacienda guidelines. Mr. Iserson further reported that although staff is pleased with the architectural design, there was some concern with the way Phase 5 was completed. Staff felt that the spacing between the two buildings was not handled in the best way, and they have, therefore, requested that the applicant address that concern. The applicant has complied and agreed to plant some additional trees in that area. Also, their azchitect is working with staff in an attempt to further embellish that azea by screening the interior vehicular courtyard from Hopyazd Road, by adding a trellis or similar feature. In addition, staff raised some concerns with the shrubs and ground cover proposed for the landscape plan. The applicant has further agreed to comply with staffs requests which have been added as a condition for approval. It was also stated by Mr. Iserson that the applicant has agreed to add public art to the project, and a condition of approval has been included to address that issue. Finally, Mr. Iserson reported that staff feels the project is well designed and meets the Hacienda Design Guidelines. It has also been approved by the Hacienda Owner's Association, and staff is recommending approval subject to the conditions outlined in the staff report. A brief question and answer discussion followed relating to various portions of the application. PUBLIC HEARING WAS OPENED Ed Choi, the architect for the project, addressed the Commission. He stated that he agrees with the staff report and conditions for approval. He also stated that he intends to meet with staff in order to resolve their concern relating to the space between the buildings constructed under Phase V. In addition, he stated that the owners of the property will meet with the Civic Arts Commission regarding public art work for the project. PUBLIC HEARING WAS CLOSED Chair Cooper expressed his thanks to the applicant for providing public art. Commissioner Kumazan commented that since the property is on a very visible site, it is of great value for it to look attractive. He is pleased with and supports the project. Commissioner Barker shared the same opinion, adding that she is glad that staff addressed the comments concerning this project made at the joint Planning Commisison/City Council Workshop. She feels that the trellis will help. A motion was made by Commissioner Barker, seconded by Commissioner Wright, recommending approval of PUD-81-30-74D, subject to the conditions listed in Exhibit "B". Planning Commission Page 3 February 11, 1998