Laserfiche WebLink
S <br />"islands" of unincorporated territory. Unincorporated areas are <br />~" s largely rural lands. <br />~ iii:nt. However, the "pocket" and "island" areas ~t_-_ ..«~__ ~L_ <br />~ ..__L___.._~:.._ ~:..,. are generally developed. Full municipal services <br />~ are not provided to these areas; typically, well water, septic tanks, <br />and substandard county or private roads are used. Further development <br />in these "pocket" and "island" areas is restricted because of the lack <br />'~ of utilities. The general plan contemplates the eventual incorporation <br />~ of such areas, the provision of utilities and facilities, and further <br />~ development to reach the planned density and/or useā€¢of the land. <br />The sphere of influence adopted by LAFCO for Pleasanton describes the <br />outer limits of intensive urban development to be serviced by Pleasanton. <br />Unincorporated areas outside the sphere of influence are not planned <br />to be developed at urban intensity or are planned to be serviced by <br />a different municipality. Such areas will not be annexed by Pleasanton; <br />indeed, these areas cannot annex to Pleasanton without a change in the <br />sphere boundary. <br />Areas within the sphere of influence yet outside the Urbanization Line <br />are planned for post-1996 development. If properties in this area <br />h were annexed at a time prior to any likelihood of development, false <br />~~ hopes of receiving full city services would be raised. The Urbaniza- <br />tion Line closely coincides with the existing city limits except for <br />those urbanized county areas adjacent to or surrounded by the city. <br />~ As has been shown, 20 years worth of development in the city could be <br />~ accommodated within the Urbanization Line. Orderly, efficient growth <br />'~~ dictates that these areas develop before new areas are annexed and <br />ti developed. <br />V <br />o Policy 14: To refrain from annexing properties located outside <br />the Urbanization Line unless it is determined that the <br />city is capable of providing services to additional properties. <br />The developed, unincorporated areas adjacent to the city and the unin- <br />corporated pockets benefit from many city services. Parks, access <br />streets, cultural facilities and programs are just some of the services <br />provided by the city to these areas. Some areas are also served by <br />water and sewer systems. Equitable considerations suggest that such <br />areas pay their fair share of these services through the city tax <br />process. <br />The urbanized areas in unincorporated pockets not fully served by <br />utilities are also. potential health hazards. New building proposals <br />in several areas have been denied because of unsafe drinking water <br />supplies or increased danger of contamination of water supplies from <br />septic tank sewerage systems. Streets are narrow, frequently lack <br />adequate shoulders, and have no provision for bicycle or pedestrian <br />traffic. These conditions, existing in fairly densely populated areas <br />and adjacent to intensively developed areas, should be quickly up- <br />_ graded to full city standards. <br />-10- <br /> <br />