Laserfiche WebLink
improve the City diversion rate by 15 to 20%. As a result, if the Council determines it is <br />more advantageous to retain the current practice of operating a comingled recycling <br />program, it is requested to provide feedback to the City Council Subcommittee. Further, <br />if there are additional programs that the Council would like to see explored, feedback is <br />requested. <br />Franchise Extension and Construction and Demolition Debris <br />The Subcommittee has also explored the potential of a short term franchise extension <br />as a means of spreading out the costs of these programs over a longer period of time to <br />reduce the initial rate adjustment. Unfortunately, the discussions have just begun and <br />no proposals or responses have been exchanged. <br />In addition to the above, PGS and the City have agreed to finalize a Construction and <br />Debris (C&D) policy or ordinance that will improve opportunities for recycling <br />construction material at construction sites. The City has made previous attempts to <br />address this matter, but discussions have stalled for a number of reasons including <br />allowing professional recyclers in the City may violate the PGS Franchise and may <br />result in more trucks on City streets. Also using multiple recyclers makes if difficult to <br />track recyclable material and as a result it may in fact be credited to another City or not <br />tracked at all. Finally, because PGS services all C&D, the majority of revenue collected <br />from this activity should be retained in the franchise to offset costs which affect <br />customer service rates. Non-franchised haulers would generally be free to profit from <br />the sale of recyclables without remuneration to the City. <br />DISCUSSION <br />While the Council has preferred to approve all rates at one meeting, the uniqueness of <br />this review warrants a different course based on the number of program changes being <br />explores and the fact that staff and the Subcommittee are concerned that further delay <br />will worsen the company's revenue and expense situation which will ultimately result in <br />a higher rate adjustment. Also, due to the complexities involved with designing and <br />pricing the new recycling services, it will take approximately six months to resolve these <br />issues. Finally, staff anticipates that the Franchise extension discussions may require <br />detailed legal analysis which will also be time consuming. <br />Based on the above, staff has identified a number of Options as follows: <br />Approve the 12% across the board rate increase to address those reserves or cost <br />centers where there is agreement between PGS and the City. Doing this places <br />PGS in a better financial position to continue providing a high level of service while <br />addressing most short term expenses with available revenue. Considering the fact <br />that another rate increase is highly probable, the two step process may help lessen <br />the impact of the full increase at one time. <br />2. Do not approve a rate increase at this time but direct staff and the Subcommittee to <br />resolve all issues related to current services within 30 days with the expectation that <br />this rate will be reviewed and if appropriate, approved by the Council. This option <br />Page 6 of 7 <br />