12 - Laserfiche WebLink

F (a t~i EL St ~ E E RS TRAM S~P~t~t 19M StlkSUil~N iS • Transit and shuttle vehicle circulation within and adjacent to site • Pedestrian access to and from transit stops • Truck circulation and loading dock access for the gas station of grocery store TASK 8 -PARKING ANALYSIS Fehr & Peers will calculate peak parking demand for the site using parking demand rates presented in the Institute of Transportation Engineers publication Parking Generation, 3rd Edition, and the proposed project land uses. The Urban Land Institute's Shared Parking, 2nd Edition, will be used to evaluate the potential for shared parking on the site given the proposed mixture of land uses. Parking as required by the City's Zoning Ordinance will also be calculated. Consideration will also be given to bicycle parking needs and placement. Mitigation measures will be identified for parking impacts. TASK 9 -CONGESTION MANAGEMENT AGENCY ASSESSMENT A separate analysis of regional roadways is recommended to comply with requirements of the Alameda County Congestion Management Agency (ACCMA). The ACCMA requires the analysis of project impacts to Metropolitan Transportation System (MTS) roadways for development projects that would generate more than 100 PM peak hour trips. Based on preliminary trip generation estimates, the proposed Project would generate substantially more than 100 PM peak hour trips. The ACCMA requires that the baseline forecasts be represented by the model run completed by the ACCMA. Fehr & Peers proposes to add the project-related traffic directly to the baseline forecasts and compare the net change as a percentage of total traffic. The ACCMA model is based on the 2015 and 2030 forecast years. It will be used to evaluate segments on the following roadways in the study area: I-680, Bernal Avenue, Foothill Road, Sunol Boulevard, Stanley Boulevard, Santa Rita Road, and Hopyard Road. Conditions with the project will also be analyzed. TASK 10 -PROJECT ALTERNATIVES Fehr & Peers will perform a qualitative evaluation of up to two project alternatives. Trip generation will be calculated and compared to that of the proposed project. The potential for the alternatives to reduce the significant impacts of the project will be discussed; however, detailed intersection and freeway analysis will not be completed for the alternatives. TASK 11 -DOCUMENTATION The following documents will be prepared: • Technical Memorandum summarizing study intersections for City review and approval • Technical Memorandum summarizing project trip generation and distribution assumptions for City review and approval • Technical Memorandum summarizing traffic forecasts for City review and approval Scope of Work Page 4 - 5