06 - Laserfiche WebLink

Subsequent to the public workshops, the project consultants and staff learned from the SPA that there may be site constraints with regards to the storm water detention area in the neighborhood park. This is primarily due to the need to have the storm water outfall as close as possible to the continuing care facility. As a result, it was necessary to modify the proposed master plan slightly by reconfiguring the storm water detention area and altering uses in the neighborhood park. The dog exercise area was moved to the western portion of the site, and depicted in a more linear form (including both small and large areas). The bocce courts were also eliminated. It was suggested that if there was a strong desire to construct additional bocce courts for community use, possible expansion at the Senior Center could be an option for consideration in the future. Other changes proposed to the Parks and Recreation Commission included moving the restroom facility slightly closer to the neighborhood park and a reduction of two (2) parking spaces near the tennis courts/dog exercise area. As previously noted, placement of the restroom was focused near the trailhead and children's play area; however, the new location made the facility slightly more accessible to those using the neighborhood park. Given the reconfiguration of the detention basin, it was also necessary to reduce the adjacent parking. The Parks and Recreation Commission reviewed the proposed master plan at its regular meeting on April 10, 2008. Attachment 1 represents the revised plan it considered, which incorporated the suggestions received at the final community workshop. After receiving a presentation from staff and the project consultants regarding the master plan, and clarifying several points of interest, the meeting was opened for public comment. A total of 21 speakers addressed the commission. Several supported the inclusion of a second restroom facility and an additional water element. The primary focus of discussion, however, was whether to include an ice facility as an amenity in the plan. Proponents felt it would be strongly supported by skating enthusiasts in the Tri-Valley area, many who are traveling long distances for ice time. They also believed the ice facility provided a positive outlet for Pleasanton youth and families. Opponents to the ice rink expressed concern about the anticipated size of the facility, and the fact it would likely be a regional draw. The impacts of traffic were discussed, the lack of information concerning an ice rink operator's financial contribution to the other park improvements, and placement of afor-profit venture in a public park. After accepting public comment, Commissioners indicated their collective support for an ice rink facility, a second restroom facility, and two (2) water related elements. Concern was expressed about the detention basin, particularly what type of uses could be incorporated into the 3.5 acre facility. Staff indicated that additional study would be required; however, the hope was to provide public access to the basin during periods when it was not being used for water retention. Commissioners also expressed a desire that the ice rink operator, if the facility is approved, be responsible for the park improvements, and that all park amenities be constructed concurrent with the ice rink. A copy of the minutes from the meeting are included as Attachment 5. Page 6 of 10