Laserfiche WebLink
natural land contours and heritage trees, minimizing the visual impacts of <br />building on the hills, and minimizing grading in landslide-prone areas, it could be <br />argued that any new hillside development regulations should be applied to all <br />development and not just to projects of more than 10 homes. <br />Options: Apply the potential hillside development regulations fo projects of 10 or <br />more units; or, apply the regulations to all hillside development, regardless of the <br />number of units. <br />• Where should development be restricted? A 25 percent slope represents a <br />climb of approximately 11 degrees above the horizontal, or a 4 to 1 slope (a one <br />foot rise for every four foot on the horizontal). The maximum developable slope <br />under the proposed initiative is 25 percent; although development of land with a <br />slope of 25 percent does not represent any particular engineering or technical <br />challenge, there is some precedent for using a 25 percent slope cut-off point for <br />development as seen in the 1996 General Plan policy language referenced <br />above. <br />Several existing hillside projects, including The Preserve, Golden Eagle Farm, <br />and Kottinger Ranch, were built on sites that include land with slopes of 25 <br />percent or more, as provided for in the General Plan. These developments were <br />approved through the PUD process following environmental review (EIR's were <br />certified for each of the projects). In Attachment 1 to this agenda report are maps <br />that show the existing development and the natural slopes on the property prior <br />to development. For example, Map 1 a of the existing Kottinger Ranch <br />development shows the roads following the ridge tops that were the flatter parts <br />of the site. It also should be noted that Fire Department policy is for fire access <br />roads to be no more than 15 percent slope, although such roads may have short <br />stretches of up to 20 percent slope. <br />Staff has also prepared a map (Attachment 2) which shows the location of <br />selected undeveloped hillside properties. As shown, areas of less than 25 <br />percent slope (potentially developable) are often separated by bands of more <br />steeply sloped areas. If (as set forth in the Save Pleasanton's Hills Initiative) <br />development is prohibited on land with 25 percent or greater slopes, there is a <br />question whether grading for roads on land exceeding 25 percent slopes (which <br />would be necessary to provide access to developable portions of the site) would <br />be permitted. (The Initiative language reads, "No grading to construct residential <br />or commercial structures shall occur on hillside slopes 25% or greater... "). If <br />such grading were not permitted, very little of the remaining undeveloped land in <br />the Southeast Hills would be developable under the proposed Initiative. <br />The Save Pleasanton's Hills Initiative also would prohibit development within 100 <br />feet of a ridgeline. "Ridgeline" is not defined in the Initiative and could be broadly <br />interpreted to include almost any high point on a property. Such an interpretation <br />could be problematic, however. For example, even in the Foothill Road area <br />Page6of9 <br />