My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
20
City of Pleasanton
>
CITY CLERK
>
AGENDA PACKETS
>
2008
>
052008
>
20
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/15/2008 3:14:09 PM
Creation date
5/15/2008 3:14:08 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
STAFF REPORTS
DOCUMENT DATE
5/20/2008
DESTRUCT DATE
15 Y
DOCUMENT NO
20
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
9
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
where the ridgelines are fairly well defined, there are a number of foreridges <br />below the main ridge that could also be considered "ridgelines." The Southeast <br />Hills area is a complex web of ridges and valleys, with a few highly visible ridges <br />and others almost hidden to most observers. If the objective of the regulation is <br />to prohibit development that breaks the skyline of a ridge, then it would be <br />important to adopt clarifying regulations that specifically define and identify which <br />ridges are most prominent and should be protected. <br />Options: <br />o Prohibit development and grading on all lands with a natural slope of 25 <br />percent or more; <br />o Alternatively, prohibit development on such slopes except where grading for <br />roads is necessary to access property that is developable. <br />o Further options could prohibit development above a certain elevation, which <br />may reduce the visibility of development; or identify visually prominent <br />ridgelines where development is prohibited within 100 vertical feet of such <br />ridgeline. <br />How should residential density be calculated? The question of how <br />residential density should be calculated was previously discussed at a General <br />Plan Land Use Workshop in March 2006, when undeveloped properties on the <br />west side of Pleasanton were discussed. At that time, the City Council directed <br />that land over 25 percent slope not be excluded from the calculation of residential <br />density in the General Plan update. As stated at that time, regardless of the <br />maximum calculated residential density for any given parcel, the City Council <br />through the PUD development process can determine the appropriate (e.g., <br />potentially fewer) number of units for that property. <br />• Should grading be minimized by better fitting development to the land? <br />Hillside development in Pleasanton typically follows one of two models: <br />development that creates flat pads in a terraced formation with or without the use <br />of retaining walls, or development where the homes are designed to fit the <br />contours of the land. Flat pad development which is typical for larger production <br />home projects may involve a great deal of earth moving, possibly more tree loss, <br />and, depending on the skill of the project engineer, may result in an unnatural <br />site appearance until landscaping matures. On the other hand, flat pad <br />development, or at least homes with some portion of the lot graded relatively flat, <br />is desirable to homebuyers seeking usable yard areas. Homes that are designed <br />to closely fit hillside contours can be built with less grading, fewer retaining walls, <br />and sometimes fewer disturbances to native vegetation. However, these homes <br />require custom architecture and may be more visible as the home follows the <br />slope of the hillside. <br />Options: Require development to conform to the natural grade or allow flat pad <br />development. <br />Page7of9 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.