My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
20
City of Pleasanton
>
CITY CLERK
>
AGENDA PACKETS
>
2008
>
052008
>
20
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/15/2008 3:14:09 PM
Creation date
5/15/2008 3:14:08 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
STAFF REPORTS
DOCUMENT DATE
5/20/2008
DESTRUCT DATE
15 Y
DOCUMENT NO
20
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
9
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
voters. If adopted, either by Council or by the voters, the Initiative would amend policies <br />in the Land Use Element of the General Plan to prohibit building or grading on slopes of <br />25 percent or greater or within 100 vertical feet of a ridgeline. Housing developments of <br />10 or fewer units would be exempted from the policy. <br />The Initiative provides an opportunity to discuss the issue of hillside development with <br />the City Council and to determine if existing policies and regulations provide sufficient <br />protection of Pleasanton's hillside areas, or if new hillside protection regulations are <br />warranted. <br />DISCUSSION <br />As noted above, the existing General Plan provides a policy framework for hillside <br />development based on several goals: ensuring the stability of slopes and the safety of <br />hillside development; preserving the visual open space character of the hills; and <br />retaining heritage trees and natural land forms. New hillside protection regulations <br />would create development standards and regulations to implement these goals in <br />specific areas. The following paragraphs lay out options for what topics might be <br />regulated and where the regulations could be applied. Staff is seeking City Council <br />feedback and direction. <br />• What area is to be subject to new regulations? As noted above, the <br />Ridgelands area west of Foothill Road is covered in the General Plan (and <br />cannot be changed except by a further vote of the people) and in the West <br />Foothill Road Overlay District. In addition, the City's Urban Growth Boundary and <br />the County's Measure D Urban Limit line effectively prohibit new land <br />subdivisions beyond these boundaries. Land inside the City's UGB in the <br />Southeast Hills, however, is generally subject to discretionary review through the <br />PUD review process, and development projects are reviewed against the <br />General Plan policies. Development in the Vineyard Avenue area is also <br />regulated by the Vineyard Avenue Corridor Specific Plan. Some of the Vineyard <br />Avenue Corridor properties are also covered by development agreements; to the <br />extent that a property owner has a development agreement with the City, during <br />the term of that agreement, new hillside regulations (whether adopted by initiative <br />or City Council action) would have no effect. <br />Options: One option would be to subject all the above hillside areas to new hillside <br />protection regulations. Alternatively, if it is believed that the western Ridgelands <br />General Plan policies (adopted by the voters), the existing West Foothill Road <br />Overlay District, and the Vineyard Avenue Corridor Specific Plan provide sufficient <br />regulation for the hillsides in these areas, the potential regulations could apply only <br />to the Southeast Hills. <br />• What projects to include? The language in the Save Pleasanton's Hills <br />Initiative regarding hillside development states that projects of 10 or fewer units <br />would be exempt from the policy regarding development on slopes and <br />ridgelines. However, if the objectives of new regulations include retaining the <br />Page 5 of 9 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.