Laserfiche WebLink
e. Preservation of open space or <br />agricultural uses is not a general plan objective for the <br />Project site, as the Project site is currently designated for <br />residential use, and such a residential use may be more <br />compatible with the surrounding developed or developing <br />properties than is current continuing agricultural or open <br />space use; and <br />f. The social, economic and benefits to be <br />derived from the Project as discussed in the Statement of <br />Overriding Considerations (Section IIi, above) would not be <br />obtained. <br />This City Council further finds that the No Project <br />Alternative, with respect to environmental impacts on and <br />around the Project site, is identical to an alternative which <br />would include a different site for the same proposed <br />development. The City Council finds that the impacts upon the <br />Project site and surrounding properties of development at <br />another site are identical to the impacts of the No Project <br />Alternative, as an analysis of the same development at another <br />site will, by definition, be an analysis of no project at the <br />Project site. <br />The City Council further finds that it is <br />inappropriate to evaluate different project sites in the EIR to <br />accompany this specific plan proposal, as this specific site <br />has already been designated by the City as an area for <br />residential development. Any evaluation of alternate sites to <br />49 <br />