My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
PC-88- 26
City of Pleasanton
>
BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS
>
PLANNING
>
RESOLUTIONS
>
1980-1989
>
1988
>
PC-88- 26
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/18/2008 10:35:20 AM
Creation date
3/26/2008 12:21:14 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
RESOLUTIONS
DOCUMENT DATE
3/9/1988
DOCUMENT NO
PC-88- 26
DOCUMENT NAME
SP-87-1
NOTES
TMI ANALYSTS, INC
NOTES 2
REQUIRED FINDINGS AS REQUIRED BY CEQA FOR TMI SPECIFIC PLAN
NOTES 3
NW CRNR OF INTERSECTION I-680 AND BERNAL AVE
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
56
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
e. Preservation of open space or <br />agricultural uses is not a general plan objective for the <br />Project site, as the Project site is currently designated for <br />residential use, and such a residential use may be more <br />compatible with the surrounding developed or developing <br />properties than is current continuing agricultural or open <br />space use; and <br />f. The social, economic and benefits to be <br />derived from the Project as discussed in the Statement of <br />Overriding Considerations (Section IIi, above) would not be <br />obtained. <br />This City Council further finds that the No Project <br />Alternative, with respect to environmental impacts on and <br />around the Project site, is identical to an alternative which <br />would include a different site for the same proposed <br />development. The City Council finds that the impacts upon the <br />Project site and surrounding properties of development at <br />another site are identical to the impacts of the No Project <br />Alternative, as an analysis of the same development at another <br />site will, by definition, be an analysis of no project at the <br />Project site. <br />The City Council further finds that it is <br />inappropriate to evaluate different project sites in the EIR to <br />accompany this specific plan proposal, as this specific site <br />has already been designated by the City as an area for <br />residential development. Any evaluation of alternate sites to <br />49 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.