My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
PC-88- 26
City of Pleasanton
>
BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS
>
PLANNING
>
RESOLUTIONS
>
1980-1989
>
1988
>
PC-88- 26
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/18/2008 10:35:20 AM
Creation date
3/26/2008 12:21:14 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
RESOLUTIONS
DOCUMENT DATE
3/9/1988
DOCUMENT NO
PC-88- 26
DOCUMENT NAME
SP-87-1
NOTES
TMI ANALYSTS, INC
NOTES 2
REQUIRED FINDINGS AS REQUIRED BY CEQA FOR TMI SPECIFIC PLAN
NOTES 3
NW CRNR OF INTERSECTION I-680 AND BERNAL AVE
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
56
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
be made should be made at the time that such general plan <br />designations or amendments are adopted, not later. <br />B, e2i Dwelling Unit Alternative. -. <br />This alternative would provide for a specific plan for <br />development of medium density residential uses including four <br />hundred twenty-one (421) dwelling units on the Project site. <br />This alternative assumes that the site would be developed with <br />lot sizes ranging from 3,575 square feet to 30,000 square feet. <br />1. Facts. As summarized at page 86 and 87 of <br />the DEIR, this alternative would lead to a higher number of <br />residences on the site, ezposing a slightly higher number of <br />people to risks from seismic movement. This alternative would <br />lead to additional traffic demand which create the need for <br />additional lanes and a signal at the Foothill Road and Bernal <br />Avenue intersection, and certain mitigation measures would be <br />required to maintain the efficiency of the Bernal Avenue Baits <br />off Interstate 680. Because this alternative proposes a higher <br />density of homes, certain of the homes to be constructed could <br />be more affordable. Higher density residential use will <br />increase the risk of property damage from seismic movement, <br />erosion and failure of unstable soil, as stated on page 38 of <br />the DEIR. This alternative would have the same impacts upon <br />land use as the proposed Project, as stated at page 32. This <br />alternative would produce slightly more noise and place a <br />greater number of homes in an area of greater noise than the <br />proposed Project, although the impact of this alternative on <br />50 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.