My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
05B
City of Pleasanton
>
CITY CLERK
>
AGENDA PACKETS
>
2008
>
033108
>
05B
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/21/2008 11:21:00 AM
Creation date
3/21/2008 11:17:59 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
STAFF REPORTS
DOCUMENT DATE
3/31/2008
DESTRUCT DATE
15 Y
DOCUMENT NO
05B
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
32
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Projected Enrollments from 2007 to 2017 Pleasanton Unified School District <br />As was stated in our past reports, extrapolations of (1) recent student population trends and (2) the <br />current enrollment distribution through the grades are the primary reasons for these grade level <br />differences. The district's secondary-school population rose significantly in recent years as an <br />enrollment "bubble" both graduated upward through the grades and increased in the process. That <br />bubble is now mainly in the high school grades, with the "peak" in twelfth grade. There are more than <br />1,300 students in twelfth, which is the most in any single grade in district history. By contrast, the total <br />in twelfth had been among the smallest in every year for as far back as data is available. The next three <br />largest current amounts are in the remaining high school grades, with each having more than 1,240 <br />students. The middle school grades contain between 1,160 and 1,210 students (i.e., the "tail" of the <br />bubble). All of the elementary grade totals are under 1,100 because the bubble has graduated past <br />that level. (The reverse was true a decade ago, when the largest single-grade amounts were in the <br />elementary grades, followed by the middle school grades.) While the enrollment in every student <br />body class should continue to rise as each class graduates upward, these lower amounts now in K-5 <br />are unlikely to grow sufficiently to recreate the current middle school total between 2009 and 2012. <br />Similarly, the smaller totals now in 6-8 probably will not increase enough to match the current high <br />school total, especially for next year. Only the elementary level is not impacted by the passing of this <br />bubble, so that has a much greater potential for modest growths <br />Although this comparison of the enrollments by grade is an oversimplification of all of the factors that <br />go into these projections, it does provide a quick insight into why the shifts vary between grade levels. <br />District-Wide ProjLected Enrollments: From 2012 to 2017 <br />Enrollment projections more than five years into the future always have a large and increasing potential <br />range of deviation. Unforeseeable socio-economic changes can have a dramatic impact over that <br />amount of time. No one in 1995 had heard of the "dot-com boom" that was about to start, and no one <br />of consequence in 1999 was projecting the extent of the "dot-com bust" that occurred in 2000. <br />Those events had real enrollment impacts. And no one knows how much the birth counts will change <br />in the near future, which corresponds to the kindergarten populations starting in 2012. <br />What we do feel confident in saying, nonetheless, is that the enrollment total is unlikely to shift <br />dramatically in the latter half of the projection period, once the bubble is gone. Your community may be <br />entering a period of student population equilibrium coming from the current mix of younger and <br />middle-aged families, newer and older homes, and modest and higher income neighborhoods. The <br />birth data discussed later in this report supports this possibility, with the aging of ongoing families (who <br />tend to have fewer births over time) being virtually offset, in terms of recent birth counts, by the young <br />families entering the community via new and resold housing. The one minor shift that could reduce the <br />long-range kindergarten numbers will be a reduction in the number of new detached homes expected <br />to be built (as is discussed later in this report). <br />Our best estimate is thus that the total enrollment will decline by a couple of hundred between 2012 <br />and 2017. The specific forecast number shown in Table 1 is to be down by 201 students over ten <br />years, to a total of 14,601, but being plus or minus by 900 from that is a real possibility that far into the <br />future. With such a wide potential range, we recommend focusing your planning on the projections for <br />the next four or five years and using the long-range estimates solely for "what if" facility considerations. <br />e See Appendix Al for the current (and projected) totals by grade and see Appendix 63 for the by-grade counts <br />since 1993 that are available from the State. The district total was so much lower prior to 1993, compared to the <br />current and recent totals, that we feel safe in assuming that 1,300 had never occurred before in any grade. <br />Enrollment Projection Consultants Page 4 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.