My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
05B
City of Pleasanton
>
CITY CLERK
>
AGENDA PACKETS
>
2008
>
033108
>
05B
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/21/2008 11:21:00 AM
Creation date
3/21/2008 11:17:59 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
STAFF REPORTS
DOCUMENT DATE
3/31/2008
DESTRUCT DATE
15 Y
DOCUMENT NO
05B
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
32
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Projected Enrollments from 2007 to 2017 Pleasanton Unified School District <br /> Chart 1: <br /> Change in Enrollment Distribution from Areas with No New Housing since Sept. 2003 <br /> 1200 <br /> <br /> 1100 <br /> <br /> <br /> 1000 <br /> <br />y <br /> Oct <br />2003 <br /> 900 . <br />~ <br /> <br /> -Oct. 2007 <br />y <br /> <br /> 800 <br /> <br /> 700 <br /> <br /> 600 <br /> <br /> K 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 <br /> Grade <br />Recent Resident Student Population Changes by Type of Existing Housing <br />A key refinement in the analysis of the trends in existing housing is to determine the degree to which <br />the overall patterns are shared by the various dwelling types and income levels (which are interpolated <br />from the housing values). We generally find that trends common to the majority of neighborhoods are <br />more likely to be ongoing, at least to some degree. By assigning a standardized, but nonetheless <br />subjective, EPC classification to the dominant residential type in each of the 233 planning areas that <br />we created and then aggregating the area counts for every such classification of existing dwellings, we <br />have again been able to determine the diversity of the latest trends. These findings are summarized in <br />Table 4 on pages 13-15, with additional information provided in Appendices B1 and B2. <br />Understanding the Data in Table 4 <br />Table 4 contains the resident totals of district-enrolled students in October of 2003 through 2007 from <br />areas with virtually no new housing added in the last four years. The 2003 figures are shown mainly to <br />indicate whether or not any unusual trends of the last three years also occurred in the previous year. <br />Except for those "odd" trends, we have focused our analyses on the changes since 2004. <br />The counts are shown in groups of three grades each (K-2, 3-5, 6-8 and 9-11, as well as K-12) so that <br />we can easily show both (1) how the populations have changed as the students graduated upward by <br />three grades over three years and (2) the general age distribution of the students. Existing "Modest & <br />Moderate Income" SFD (single-family-detached) homes, for instance, had 296 students in K-2 in 2004 <br />and 308 students in grades 3-5 this year, which was a net gain of 12 students in that population as it <br />graduated upward by three grades. This is what the "12" in "3-Year Change into Next Group" means in <br /> ~` <br /> <br />. ^ <br />• i <br />• 1 <br />~~ /~ <br />~ •~ • <br />/ • <br />_ i <br />. ~~~ <br />'~ <br />• <br />r_ ' <br />i <br />• <br /> <br /> <br />Enrollment Projection Consultants Page 1l <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.