My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
05B
City of Pleasanton
>
CITY CLERK
>
AGENDA PACKETS
>
2008
>
033108
>
05B
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/21/2008 11:21:00 AM
Creation date
3/21/2008 11:17:59 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
STAFF REPORTS
DOCUMENT DATE
3/31/2008
DESTRUCT DATE
15 Y
DOCUMENT NO
05B
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
32
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Projected Enrollments from 2007 to 2017 Pleasanton Unified School District <br />that section of the table (see lowest row in top section of page 13). We also show how the K-2 group <br />has evolved during that time, which was a net gain of 22 students (the boxed "22") due to a rise from <br />296 to 318. That shift in K-2 is "boxed" because it is an important indication of whether the families of <br />the students are getting older, with declining future kindergarten amounts likely, or are instead <br />becoming younger (through turnover), thereby generating potential pending kindergarten growth. <br />Since the distribution has changed from a strong tilt toward the upper elementary and secondary <br />grades in 2004 to slightly more students in K-2 (318) than 3-5 (308), while still having far more in 9-11 <br />(388), there appears to a mix of mainly aging families but also some younger parents having moved into <br />these neighborhoods. That strong tilt toward the high school grades still indicates a pending <br />reduction in K-12, but at least the numbers have turned around slightly in the lowest grades, which <br />suggests stable or even moderately rising elementary totals (from these homes). <br />Key Findings from the Data in Table 4 <br />There is significant divergence in some of the recent student population shifts by housing category. If <br />one focuses on just the boxed numbers in Table 4, there is a general trend of student growth from the <br />"Modest" through "Modern Upper Middle Income" detached and all non-duet attached (ATT) units.12 <br />Those gains are disproportionately, and sometimes entirely, in the K-2 group. "Traditional Middle <br />Income" SFD homes, for example, added 27 students in K-2 despite growing by only eight students <br />overall. What differs between these less expensive groups is the degree of growth in each of those <br />populations. The student totals jumped by over 10% since 2004 in both the "Modest" and "Upscale" <br />(non-duet) ATT complexes (see top of page 14), with even larger increases in K-2. These rates of <br />growth are unlikely to continue for an extended period of time, as those ATT units already have higher <br />average numbers of students per unit (based on EPC sampling) than in most other districts. While the <br />desirability of the district schools is clearly driving both this increase and those higher average ratios, <br />there nonetheless is a realistic upper limit that, on average, will be reached. If a theoretical complex of <br />small (one- and two-bedroom) ATT units shifted from averaging one student in every four units to one <br />student in three in just the last three years, that does not mean it will average one in every two units in <br />another five years and then three students in every four units in ten years. The higher probability is to <br />reach a maximum somewhere under one in every two units, as the majority of one bedroom units are <br />unlikely to have students. Additional student growth is probable from these ATT dwellings (as the <br />larger totals now in K-2 graduate into the upper grades), but not at these latest rates for much longer. <br />The totals from the'`Modest" through "Modern Upper Middle Income" (i.e., on small lots with minimal <br />yards) detached homes, by contrast, had less significant growth rates of 1 % to 5% since 2004. Usually <br />these more sustainable rates would suggest ongoing K-12 gains if not for one factor: the "bubble" <br />now in the high school grades (see top of half of page 13). Even with further growth in K-2, the loss <br />through graduation of that bubble from the traditional (large-lot) less expensive SFD homes strongly <br />points to an overall student decline in the next three years. There probably will be simultaneous gains <br />in the elementary grades and even greater reductions in the secondary grades during that time. <br />The real divergence from the aforementioned trends occurred in "Traditional Upper Middle Income" <br />through "Highest Income" SFD residences. These built-before-2003 dwellings already have declining <br />student populations, in some cases by much more than 10% in the last three (and four) years, and will <br />have further reductions based on the current distribution through the grades. And the K-2 counts are <br />all much lower than in 2003, so there is little sign of an increase of young families moving in. The K-2 <br />drop from "Upper & Highest Income", in particular, has been significant. That fell from 300 to 211. <br />'Z Attached (ATT) housing includes apartments, condominiums, townhouses, plexes and duets. <br />Enrollment Projection Consultants Page 12 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.