My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
15 ATTACHMENT 9
City of Pleasanton
>
CITY CLERK
>
AGENDA PACKETS
>
2008
>
031808
>
15 ATTACHMENT 9
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/2/2008 1:56:39 PM
Creation date
3/14/2008 4:54:38 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
STAFF REPORTS
DOCUMENT DATE
3/18/2008
DESTRUCT DATE
15 Y
DOCUMENT NO
15 ATTACHMENT 9
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
380
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
The two-story home would measure approximately 30.2-feet tall as measured from the <br />lowest grade adjacent to the house to the top of the main roof ridge and approximately 35.2- <br />feet tall at the top of the cupola, excluding the finial. The lowest grade adjacent to the house <br />(approximately 627 feet) was measured from the base of the front loggia that projects out <br />from the house wall. When measured from the lowest grade adjacent to the wall of the house <br />(approximately 628 feet at the nook), the house measures approximately 29.2-feet tall to the <br />top of the main roof ridge and approximately 34.2-feet tall at the top of the cupola, excluding <br />the finial. With the last workshop plans, the applicants had indicated that the height of the <br />house was 27 feet 8 inches at the top of the main roof ridge and approximately 32 feet 8 <br />inches feet at the top of the cupola, excluding the finial. Upon further review by staff, the <br />height was not measured from the lowest grade adjacent to the house and the actual height <br />was closer to 29.5 feet to the main roof ridge and 34.5 feet to the top of the cupola (these <br />measurements are estimates since full-sized, scalable plans were not submitted with the prior <br />workshop plans). Therefore, the height is substantially the same as previously considered by <br />the Planning Commission. The applicant has modified the grading and the square footage is <br />redistributed to have more of the home underground, thus reducing the overall visual <br />appearance of height and massing. <br />A color photograph of the color/material board for the Sarich Residence has been provided <br />which shows: ochre-colored stucco and limestone walls; dark brown-stained wood garage <br />doors and trellis; natural copper gutters, downspouts, and dormer roof; copper patina cupola <br />roof; and a mixture of red- and terra cotta-colored Mission-style clay roof tiles. A <br />color/material board with actual color samples will be available for viewing at the hearing. <br />The applicants have also provided color renderings of the proposed home. Images of <br />textures, colors, and materials similar to what the applicants' desire are also included in the <br />Commission's packet. <br />As required by the City's Green Building Ordinance, the proposed home is required to <br />provide for at least 50 points based on the Alameda County Waste Management Authority's <br />"Single-Family Green Building Rating System." The applicants have proposed to <br />incorporate a considerable number of "Green Building" measures into the home, providing <br />approximately 158 points. For example, the applicants would incorporate recycled flyash in <br />the concrete mix, would use FSC-certified wood for 70% of the dimensional studs and <br />panels, would exceed Title 24 state energy conservation requirements by 15%, would install <br />a solar water heating system, and would use environmentally preferred flooring and interior <br />finish materials. Please see the attached Green Building checklist for the complete list of the <br />proposed Green Building measures that are proposed for incorporation into the design of the <br />proposed home. Staff notes that a "standard" City condition of approval requires homes to <br />be designed to accommodate the installation of future roof-mounted photovoltaic panels, <br />which is one of the green building measures listed in the green building rating system and is <br />worth two points. Therefore, as conditioned, the applicants qualify for two additional green <br />points, brining the total to 160 points. <br />PUD-32 Page - 6 - November 14, 2007 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.