My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
04 ATTACHMENT 4
City of Pleasanton
>
CITY CLERK
>
AGENDA PACKETS
>
2008
>
012908
>
04 ATTACHMENT 4
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/23/2008 4:56:46 PM
Creation date
1/23/2008 4:52:53 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
STAFF REPORTS
DOCUMENT DATE
1/29/2008
DESTRUCT DATE
15 Y
DOCUMENT NO
04 ATTACHMENT 4
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
15
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
that the District consistently indicated that the schools could not afford it and people did not want <br />to pay for it. <br />In response to an inquiry by Commissioner Olson regarding whether the City would rather have <br />traffic congestion, Ms. Stern replied that the Wheels routes had been adapted to serve the <br />schools. <br />Chairperson Fox believed that the 30-foot width for alleys referenced in the first sentence of the <br />last paragraph seemed very large. <br />Page 3-16: Table 3-8. Intersection and Roadwav Improvements <br />Commissioner O'Connor noted that under "Proposed New Traffic Signals," Valley Avenue has <br />become the longest street in Pleasanton and that many new stoplights were being added with the <br />exception of Blackbird Drive and Crestline Road. He noted that it would help improve traffic <br />flow if there were stoplights all the way through. He expressed concern about safety because of <br />the proximity to the school on Valley Avenue. He noted that the traffic on that street did not <br />often come to a complete stop, which was a very dangerous situation for the children. <br />Mr. Tassano noted that Blackbird Drive and Crestline Road were both specifically removed from <br />the Signal Priority List by the City Council. <br />Chairperson Fox recalled that the City Council did not believe those stoplights would be <br />"neighborhood-friendly." <br />In response to an inquiry by Commissioner O'Connor regarding whether those stoplights could <br />be reconsidered by the City Council, Ms. Stern replied that the City Council could be informed <br />that the Planning Commission had suggested inclusion of those two stoplights. <br />Commissioner Pearce expressed concern that drivers would run the yellow lights if signal lights <br />were installed at those locations. <br />Pa e <br />No changes. <br />Page 3-18 <br />Commissioner Narum noted that the language addressing bicycles seemed contrary to the <br />encouragement ofnon-motorized transportation. She believed that narrow roadways would be at <br />the expense of bicycles. <br />Chairperson Fox believed the reference to narrower streets was with respect to slower traffic. <br />Ms. Stern replied that generally, narrow roadways were used in PUD's, especially in rural areas; <br />it may or may not include sidewalks on both sides. The City had flexibility under this language <br />to approve narrower roads, and bicycle lanes would probably not be included on those roads. <br />EXCERPTS: PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES, October 24, 2007 Page 8 of 15 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.