My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
21 ATTACHMENT 09
City of Pleasanton
>
CITY CLERK
>
AGENDA PACKETS
>
2007
>
120407
>
21 ATTACHMENT 09
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/29/2007 2:27:29 PM
Creation date
11/29/2007 12:32:01 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
STAFF REPORTS
DOCUMENT DATE
12/4/2007
DESTRUCT DATE
15 Y
DOCUMENT NO
21 ATTACHMENT 09
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
28
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
~~~ KimleyHor„ Supplemental WeekdayNVeekend Traffic Analysis -Final Report <br />l~ and Associates, inc. Home Depot, Pleasanton, CA <br />Operating Conditions and Criteria <br />Levels of service are represented by a letter scale from LOS A to LOS F, with LOS A <br />representing the best performance and LOS F representing the poorest performance <br />under significantly congested conditions. According to the City of Pleasanton <br />requirements, LOS D is an acceptable level of traffic operation at intersections in the <br />study area with the exception of the two intersections in the downtown area -First <br />Street & Vineyard Avenue and Bernal Avenue & First Street / Sunol Boulevard. Per the <br />General Plan, these two downtown intersections are exempt from LOS standards. <br />Based on Pleasanton requirements, traffic analysis to determine level of service was <br />completed using Synchro software at signalized intersections. The Synchro software <br />platforms are based on the methodology of the Highway Capacity Manual. The City of <br />Pleasanton provided the AM peak and PM Synchro models which were updated for use <br />in this evaluation. At the direction of the City, the AM peak signal timing was used for <br />the weekend analysis because it most closely resembles the free timing the City has in <br />place on the weekends. <br />Table 1 relates the operational characteristics associated with each level of service <br />category for both signalized and unsignalized intersections. <br />Table 1 -Intersection Level of Service Definitions <br /> Signalized Unsignalized <br /> (Avg. control , {Avg. control <br /> delay per delay per <br />Level of vehicle vehicle <br />Service Description sec/veh) sec/veh) <br />A Free flow with no delays. Users are virtually _< 10 <_ 10 <br /> unaffected b others in the traffic stream <br />B Stable traffic. Traffic flows smoothly with few > 10 - 20 > 10 - 15 <br /> dela s. <br />C Stable flow but the operation of individual users > 20 - 35 > 15 - 25 <br /> becomes affected by other vehicles. Modest <br /> dela s. <br />D Approaching unstable flow. Operation of individual > 35 - 55 > 25 - 35 <br /> users becomes significantly affected by other <br /> vehicles. Delays may be more than one cycle <br /> Burin peak hours. <br />E Unstable flow with operating conditions at or near > 55 - 80 > 35 - 50 <br /> the capacity level. Long delays and vehicle <br /> queuin . <br />F Forced or breakdown flow that causes reduced > 80 > 50 <br /> capacity. Stop and go traffic conditions. Excessive <br /> Ion Bela sand vehicle ueuin . <br />Source: Transportation Research Board, Hi hwa Capacit ManuaI2000, Nati onal Research Council, 2000. <br />PleasantonHomeDepot08.FinalReport.doc 3 October 16, 2~~7 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.