Laserfiche WebLink
Chairperson Fox stated it is good to mention the airport wherever possible so people who <br />are looking to move there would be aware of its existence. She added that this is <br />consistent with the East County Area Plan which includes airports and policies under its <br />Land Use section. <br /> <br />Page 2-13 <br /> <br />Commissioner Pearce inquired why the first three paragraphs under the Urban Growth <br />Boundary were deleted. Ms. Stern replied that it was more of a policy than background <br />so it was moved as a policy to the Growth Management section. <br /> <br />Commissioner Pearce inquired if, under Residential Cap at the bottom of the page, the <br />reference to counting a proportion of living units is still considered still fluid or ready to <br />be codified into the General Plan. Ms. Stern replied that the determination of whether or <br />not this should be the direction to take would be appropriate to consider under the Land <br />Use Element discussion. She indicated that this was included to reflect a previous City <br />Council direction; however, the appropriateness of this issue has also been raised various <br />times since. <br /> <br />Chairperson Fox stated that she looked at the original ballot on the housing cap and noted <br />that the term “dwelling unit” was not defined. She added that some cities define <br />“dwelling unit” as a residential living area that includes toilet and kitchen facilities. <br />Ms. Stern concurred that there is no definition on the referendum but that the census <br />includes a definition of the term. <br /> <br />Chairperson Fox inquired if it would require the vote of the people to define “housing <br />unit” as their vote is needed for any modification to the housing cap. Ms. Harryman <br />replied that her initial impression is that if the referendum did not include a definition in <br />the first place, then it is open to interpretation, which would be done by the City Council. <br /> <br />Chairperson Fox inquired if the Alameda County Measure D map which shows its UGB <br />could be included in the General Plan. Ms. Stern replied that it could be placed in the <br />Subregional Element as it is a subregional issue. <br /> <br />Page 2-14 <br /> <br />Commissioner O’Connor inquired how the population number for 2025 was arrived at, <br />considering the number of homes that have been built and under construction to date and <br />the approximately 250 units constructed per year. Ms. Stern noted that the buildout of <br />residential units is estimated to be around the year 2018, and the year 2025 is the 20-year <br />horizon for the General Plan. She explained that there are some things that contribute to <br />population increase that are not included in the cap such as second units, group quarters, <br />and assisted-living facilities. <br /> <br />PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES July 25, 2007 Page 18 of 35 <br /> <br /> <br />