My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
11 ATTACHMENT 2
City of Pleasanton
>
CITY CLERK
>
AGENDA PACKETS
>
2007
>
100207
>
11 ATTACHMENT 2
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/28/2007 12:32:40 PM
Creation date
9/25/2007 1:23:04 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
STAFF REPORTS
DOCUMENT DATE
10/2/2007
DESTRUCT DATE
15 Y
DOCUMENT NO
11 ATTACHMENT 2
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
46
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
• Anew water tank will be provided to serve the proposed project as well as <br />surrounding and nearby residential areas. <br />• An Urban/Wildland Interface Fire Management Plan (UWIFMP) including a <br />wildland/urban interface risk assessment will be prepared by a licensed <br />consultant covering the private lot landscape and building designs and open <br />space area. <br />• The entire development -public and private areas -will be subject to a <br />Geologic Hazard Abatement District. The GHAD is responsible to periodically <br />inspect the development for any indication of erosion, destabilizing slope <br />banks, etc., and then to take action to address problem areas. <br />• With recordation of the first subdivision map, the applicant will pay $1,000,000 <br />to the City to be applied to construct a traffic signal at the Bernal <br />Avenue/Kottinger Drive intersection, retime the existing signal at the Bernal <br />Avenue/Independence Drive intersection, to fund traffic calming measures on <br />Hearst Drive on a to-be-identified-basis, and to construct level-of-service <br />improvements to the City-wide intersections that will be affected by the <br />proposed development's traffic. <br />Staff, therefore, believes that this finding can be made. <br />6. Whether the proposed development plan conforms to California <br />Government Code 65863§, et. seq. <br />The proposed project would include 51 single-family units, a 47-unit reduction <br />from the 98-unit holding capacity identified in the Pleasanton Housing Element. <br />The City finds that this density reduction will not result in a net loss of density, <br />City wide, and that there are adequate sites available for development pursuant <br />to the City's housing element for the following reasons: <br />• As proposed with the attached development agreement, the 47 units that will <br />not be built on the Oak Grove site will be allowed to be transferred to a <br />different site in the City. Twenty of these 47 units would be designated as <br />affordable units meeting the City's Inclusionary Zoning Ordinance: five units <br />at the very low income level, ten units at the low income level, and five units <br />at the moderate income level. <br />• There are presently five potential sites available in the City where this density <br />could be applied: the BART property by Stoneridge Mall; the Staples Ranch <br />property; the remaining vacant properties in the Hacienda Park, (which would <br />facilitate atransit-oriented development in close proximity to business park <br />employment); the 45.77-acre Merritt property designated for Low Density <br />Residential land uses with a maximum density of 92 units and amid-point <br />density of 46 units; and vacant properties in the future East Pleasanton <br />Specific Plan (250 units are envisioned in this Plan). <br />Page 5 of 6 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.