My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
PC 053007
City of Pleasanton
>
BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS
>
PLANNING
>
MINUTES
>
2000-2009
>
2007
>
PC 053007
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/5/2017 3:30:04 PM
Creation date
8/17/2007 10:18:19 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
MINUTES
DOCUMENT DATE
5/30/2007
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
20
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />Commissioner Narum concurred with the other Commissioners’ comments and would <br />not add any parking. She would also like to evaluate the real need for parking. <br /> <br />Building Design/Green Building/Landscaping/Signage <br /> <br />Chairperson Fox noted that she liked the two buildings but wanted to ensure they were <br />safe with respect to possible window glare onto the roads. She liked the design and noted <br />that the swooping glass lines were quite striking. She did not like the other buildings <br />quite as much and would like to see more articulation in the architecture if the hotel was <br />meant to accommodate more upscale clientele. <br /> <br />Mr. Dahlin noted that was more of a business decision than an architectural decision and <br />that they would need to look for an operator of the hotel. He believed this was an <br />excellent site for a hotel. He believed that the building design was somewhat nondescript <br />because they knew the hotel operator would come in with its own brand and design <br />standards. <br /> <br />Chairperson Fox suggested that the office building on Owens Drive feature some of the <br />rounded edges that were included in the building near the freeway. <br /> <br />Commissioner Blank noted that it was difficult to address building design in detail before <br />the tenants were selected. He liked the glass elements in the freeway buildings and was <br />confident that they would be done safely. He agreed with the comments about the <br />generic nature of the hotel design at this point. He would need more detail before <br />commenting on proposed building colors and materials. He supported making the <br />buildings as green as possible and noted that when the LEED point totals exceed 100, <br />approvals were easier to come by. He would like to see more trees and landscaping and <br />believed the hotel signage must be addressed with renderings compared to the existing <br />sign. He would like to see a covered walkway to the BART station. <br /> <br />Commissioner Pearce concurred with Commissioner Blank’s comments and liked the <br />buildings by the freeway, particularly the blue color element of the glass. She would like <br />to see that element echoed in the rest of the buildings on the site, which she believed <br />would synthesize the complex and pull the buildings together. She liked the parking <br />garage and the trees and would need to see more detail with respect to colors and <br />materials. She believed the streetscape was good and would like to see the sign in more <br />detail. She echoed Commissioner Blank’s comments regarding green building and would <br />like to see as many LEED points as possible. <br /> <br />Commissioner Olson echoed the comments made by Commissioners Blank and Pearce <br />and supported Commissioner Blank’s covered walkway idea. <br /> <br />Commissioner Narum concurred with the previous comments. She liked the stair-stepped <br />levels on the office building on Owens Drive and the dramatic appearance of the <br />buildings by the freeway. She believed the character of Pleasanton should be kept in <br />PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES May 30, 2007 Page 17 of 20 <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.