My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
PC 053007
City of Pleasanton
>
BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS
>
PLANNING
>
MINUTES
>
2000-2009
>
2007
>
PC 053007
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/5/2017 3:30:04 PM
Creation date
8/17/2007 10:18:19 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
MINUTES
DOCUMENT DATE
5/30/2007
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
20
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Chairperson Fox noted that Commissioner O’Connor did not have any comments on <br />those points. <br /> <br />In response to an inquiry by Commissioner Pearce’s inquiry about the standards for <br />parking ratios, Mr. Paxson noted that there were two different parking standards within <br />the park dependent on whether they were built prior to or after 1993. This project was <br />built before 1993 and held to the parking standard of 1:250 space to square footage ratio; <br />every project since 1993 has been parked at a 3.33:1,000 ratio. They had found the <br />1:250 ratio to be more than adequate because the office densities have not gone as high as <br />250 square feet per person. They would be very comfortable in looking at a parking <br />requirement of 3.33:1,000 ratio for the office, possibly even less when taking the transit <br />orientation into account. He noted that they had a free shuttle bus to the BART station <br />with a high percentage of users. <br /> <br />Is the amount of parking acceptable? <br /> <br />Commissioner Pearce noted that since the parking exceeds the parking ordinance <br />requirement, and since Hacienda Business Park was comfortable with the numbers, she <br />was comfortable with it. She did have concerns about reducing the parking for the hotel. <br /> <br />Commissioner Blank believed the amount for parking was acceptable and was <br />comfortable with the reduction for retail. He was less concerned about the parking for <br />the hotel because it was not uncommon for groups coming in from out of town to have <br />one rental car. <br /> <br />Chairperson Fox noted that Commissioner O’Connor did not comment on the amount of <br />parking but that the amount of retail parking should not be reduced. <br /> <br />Chairperson Fox believed the parking could be consolidated and would rather see fewer <br />parking garages that were taller. She noted that when she drove through Hacienda <br />Business Park, she rarely saw a full parking lot, and requested observations from <br />Mr. Paxson. <br /> <br />Mr. Paxson concurred that was the case and noted that the Park has peak-hour traffic <br />spread throughout the Park during the day, which meant that drivers did not all come in at <br />8:00 a.m. and leave at 5:00 p.m. He noted that created a distribution of the demand on <br />parking within the projects. He noted that they examined office densities in the park, <br />which were much less dense than many other office environments; he acknowledged that <br />they over-planned for parking. He had observed higher use of transit. <br /> <br />Chairperson Fox noted that she would like to see a lot of parking spaces reduced if the <br />utilization would be 40 percent at peak. She wanted to ensure the project was not <br />overbuilt with respect to parking. <br /> <br />Commissioner Olson agreed with Commissioner Blank’s comments regarding parking <br />for the hotel and that he was in favor of reducing the overall amount of parking. <br />PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES May 30, 2007 Page 16 of 20 <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.