PC 032807 - Laserfiche WebLink

Chairperson Fox noted that the last sentence of the last paragraph on page 11 be the start of a new paragraph and be modified to read as follows: “Chairperson Fox indicated that with regard to the Mary Kay Berg situation, she read from the staff report….” Chairperson Fox also recalled that Commissioner Pearce asked Ms. Harryman and Ms. Decker whether existing businesses would be grandfathered in if they were changed to permitted uses. She recalled that Ms. Harryman provided an answer that disagreed with the staff report. Ms. Decker noted that this discussion is reflected on the fourth paragraph of page 13 and that staff believed that the legal opinion was a clarification. She added that staff agreed with the interpretation of the City Attorney and that if that opinion differed, it was simply an oversight in the staff report. She noted that staff would defer to the legal opinion offered by the Assistant City Attorney. Chairperson Fox noted that the sentence on the last paragraph on page 17 should be modified to read as follows: “…and would not support this motion in its current form.” The minutes of March 14, 2007, were approved as amended. 7.MATTERS INITIATED BY COMMISSION MEMBERS April 25, 2007 Meeting Commissioner Narum suggested that a separate meeting be held on Oak Grove because of the volume of documentation. Chairperson Fox suggested that the entire meeting of April 25, 2007 be devoted to Oak Grove. Commissioner Narum did not object to that as long as it did not delay other projects. She noted that had been pushed back several times. Commissioner Blank believed the applicant did not seem to object and suggested that an additional meeting be held as a catch-up meeting. Ms. Decker noted that Oak Grove could be the single public hearing item on April 25, 2007 and that Consent Calendar items could be included on the agenda. She noted that staff would address some of the issues that were heard under public comment and would provide a revised staff report and attachments as required. In response to a question from Commissioner Olsen, Mr. Roush confirmed that staff could provide a redline copy so that the Commissioners would know what had changed and what had not. In response to an inquiry by Commissioner Olson regarding whether that would apply to the development agreement, Mr. Roush replied that there may be some minor tweaks to the development agreement but that it was generally in final form. PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES March 28, 2007 Page 14 of 16