PC 032807 - Laserfiche WebLink

2. APPROVAL OF MINUTES a.March 14, 2007 Commissioner Blank noted that the second sentence of paragraph 1 on page 11 should be modified to read as follows: “He believed that the City should also encourage bike lanes and pedestrian access between cities in order to minimize control pollution and congestion.” Commissioner Pearce noted a typographical error on the sentence of paragraph 9 on page 5 and requested that it be corrected as follows: The Commission then discussed t Attachment 1.…” Commissioner Olson noted that sentence on the last paragraph on page 5 should be modified to read as follows: “Commissioner Olson sensed that the City’s Commission’s relationship with ABAG has been strained at times….” Commissioner Olson noted that the second sentence of the first paragraph on page 9 should be modified to read as follows: “There are traffic and public safety that need to be provided for….” Commissioner Olson noted that the last sentence of the second paragraph on page 9 should be modified to read as follows: “No agreement has as been arrived at to date.” Chairperson Fox requested that the following language be added at the beginning of the first paragraph under 4. Revisions and Omissions to the Agenda on page 3: “Michael O’Callaghan and Peter MacDonald, the original requesters of Item 6.b., were in the audience and inquired whether their item could be heard before Item 6.a.” Chairperson Fox noted that the sentence on the second paragraph under 4. Revisions and Omissions to the Agenda on page 3 should be modified to read as follows: “…in view of this, a speaker several speakers for Item 6.b. was were still en route to the meeting with the expectation that the their item would be heard….” Chairperson Fox noted that on under Page 14-2 on page 5, she asked what staff’s source was that it would be the job growth area. Chairperson Fox noted that the second to the last sentence of the first paragraph under b. PRZ-37, City of Pleasanton on page 11 should be modified to read as follows: “Michael O’Callaghan had spoken before the Commission and believed it could be considered as an office use and not subject to a conditional use permit and regulation by the City.” Chairperson Fox noted that the last sentence of the first paragraph under b. PRZ-37, City of Pleasanton on page 11 read: “She suggested that it be given a conditional use permit for that small business activity.” She believed that she had read from the minutes and agreed that the small businesses should not be overregulated. PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES March 28, 2007 Page 13 of 16