CCMIN041707 - Laserfiche WebLink

LaVeme Spotorno addressed the Council and noted their families contributions to agriculture in the area. She added tonight is the night for the Council to move forward on the decision to accept the bypass road design. It was noted that their ranch property has been tied up for fourteen years. Discussion on a possible bypass road through their ranch actually began with the former update of the General Plan in 1993. She added they are not willing to have their land tied up any longer. She commented that the Spotorno family has paid thousands of dollars on "those hills" for 140 years and they are only developing 1/5 of the their entire property. She added that they are not willing to destroy any more of their working ranch other than what has already been designated for the bypass road. The bypass road is a significant contribution to the City of Pleasanton and is also a huge sacrifice on behalf of their family. They are impacted far more than anyone else in the community. She commented that if this project does not move forward, then for the record they wish to make it known that they reserve the right to be able to use Alisal Street if needed in the future. Raju Rajagopalan addressed the Council concerning densities and in opposition to the proposed bypass. Vince Barletta addressed the Council regarding traffic congestion concems at Briddle Creek and Sycamore Heights. He noted he is not excited about a lower bypass road but if a bypass road is needed, it is better than no bypass road and further noted concerns regarding the Spotorno flat and the number of homes that might be built on it. He concluded by stating support for building the bypass road to to keep the rural flavor as it is intended and less homes is better. Bob Maund addressed the Council complimenting the committee and staff on a job well done. He added although there is no good route, he believes if the bypass road did not have to be built at this point in time no one would really suggest routing a new road up and over those hills in Pleasanton. He believes the bypass road being recommended would have a number of signfficant and unintended consequences for everyone in Happy Valley and in Pleasanton. He noted concerns with densities in the area and the funding that would be necessary to complete the bypass road. He further commented on the hills and the quality of life issues, noting it seems incredible that the City would consciously decide to build a road in those hills. The best way to maintain the semi-rural character and the quality of life in Happy Valley would be to build no new roads, and continue to restrict development in Happy Valley. He urged the Council not to support the recommended bypass road. Harpreet Dhillon, M.D. addressed the Council noting that he became aware of this issue about two weeks ago in the local newspaper. He noted the current access to the golf course is safe and stable. He pointed out that the communities of Briddle Creek and Sycamore Heights are newer communities and have small children. He feels the safety of the children will be greatly compromised by developing the access road. Currently the speed limit is 25 mph and he would hate to think the speed limit would be increased to 35 mph on Sycamore Creek Way. He added in 1992 when this initiative was given thought, the communities of Briddle Creek and Sycamore Heights were basically a twinkle in the developers eyes. He does not believe they should be made to bear the brunt of the developer and other parities who are going to monetarily benefit from this initiative and believe the greater good should be done for the greater amount of people. The course is clear in this setting....the Council has to say "no" to the HVBRC recommendations. City Council Minutes S April 17, 2007