My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
CCMIN041707
City of Pleasanton
>
CITY CLERK
>
MINUTES
>
2000-2009
>
2007
>
CCMIN041707
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/27/2007 4:06:54 PM
Creation date
5/23/2007 1:01:31 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
MINUTES
DOCUMENT DATE
4/17/2007
DESTRUCT DATE
PERMANENT
DOCUMENT NO
CCMIN041707
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
13
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Tom Smith addressed the Council as part of the HVBRC and noted he lives on Happy <br />Valley Road. He indicated he supports the Committee's decision, adding he would like to <br />see one acre parcels and would like to see the people along the road get easements to their <br />property on the backside if they are going to sacrifice getting a road in their backyards. He <br />added he hopes that the road is built first. He urged the Council to support the committee's <br />decision and fulfill the promise that was made a long time ago about getting the quality of life <br />back on Happy Valley Road. <br />Gene Jordan addressed the Council as part of the HVBRC and noted five or six years ago <br />when the bypass road was being discussed, it was truly a bypass road. It would truly allow <br />people to get to the golf course with minimal intervention to homeowners in the <br />neighborhood. When he became involved on the HVBRC, he found it interesting that option <br />was no longer on the table. He noted as they went through the Blue Ribbon Committee, it <br />became clear that the likelihood of any bypass road to be built would be based on densities <br />of homes that would be built by the Greenbriar development. <br />Hearing no further requests to speak, the Mayor closed public comment. <br />Councilmember Cook-Kallio questioned the composition of the Committee and if the <br />meetings were public. Staff responded meetings were available to the public. In terms of <br />the selection of committee members, the Council considered a staff report that designated <br />various stakeholders for the Blue Ribbon Committee. Discussion was held at great length <br />as to who those stakeholders should include. The stakeholder group was identified and <br />staff had initial meetings with the community that was open to the public and ultimately <br />invited representation from the neighborhood to fill those stakeholder groups. She clarified <br />that what was before the Council was the alignment not density. She also clarrfied that the <br />building of the road would be dependent on an EIR. She also commented on the emotional <br />nature of this issue and indicated she has followed the issue and believes it was a promise <br />of the Council to fund some sort of bypass road and believes the Council is obligated to do <br />that. She clarified any road closures would be part of an on-going negotiation. <br />City Manager Fialho clarified the Specffic Plan for the area contemplates Westbridge being <br />converted to a cul-de-sac once the bypass road is constructed. He noted that is what the <br />General Plan calls for today and should the Council decide to change the policy it could be <br />changed. He stated there is a public review process associated with that, as well as various <br />stakeholders that the City would have to meet with to get that done and that it is basically at <br />the Council's discretion as to when Council would proceed with discussions on <br />development. Staff added that Westbridge will have emergency vehicle access even if it is <br />closed. <br />Councilmember Cook-Kallio recognized this issue is a difficult balancing act. She does feel <br />the Council is obligated to move forward with a bypass road. <br />Councilmember McGovern clarified that city staff has not determined the housing density for <br />Spotomo flat at this point. She also clarified that the City is not looking at having the <br />housing pay for the entire road. The City has an obligation to fund as well due to the golf <br />course. She questioned if she were to approve the alignment tonight, Council would still <br />have to be negotiating what type of housing density would be on that property. If the <br />Council did not come up with the housing density that the landowner wanted, she <br />questioned if they could back out of the alignment that was approved tonight. <br />City Council Minutes 9 April 17, 2007 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.