My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
CCMIN091906
City of Pleasanton
>
CITY CLERK
>
MINUTES
>
2000-2009
>
2006
>
CCMIN091906
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/16/2008 3:26:47 PM
Creation date
10/24/2006 1:10:03 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
MINUTES
DOCUMENT DATE
9/19/2006
DOCUMENT NO
CCMIN091906
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
13
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />that has been streamlined and Commissioners have been more responsive. Staff will <br />monitor this issue. <br /> <br />Councilmember Brozosky asked for an update on the compensation survey for the <br />Management & Confidential Units. <br /> <br />Councilmember Thorne indicated that they are taking a look at private sector companies <br />that might be appropriate to look at to do a survey. They are in the process of choosing <br />companies now and the report will be given to the consultant to begin the survey process. <br />He believed it should take about two months. <br /> <br />Council member McGovern added the committee set criteria by which the consultant would <br />look for companies and look at the total revenue that the company is generating, the <br />number of employees that it has, the scope of services it provides and are trying to find a <br />match between some sub-sets of companies within the same type of employment that <br />exists at the City. They are also looking at geographic data and trying to make sure that it <br />is within the nine bay area county because they believe they have the same cost of living <br />as much as ours. They are looking at the tenures of firms, rather than new company's, <br />without a history and are looking for firms that may be competing for members of our staff <br />because there is a need to see what the competition is offering. They are also looking for <br />companies that the community would recognize as being quality companies. <br /> <br />Councilmember Brozosky commented on the work of the Youth Master Plan <br />Implementation Committee and the concert that took place on September 8th. <br /> <br />Council member McGovern commented that the youth in Pleasanton are quality leaders <br />and helped to pull the event together. <br /> <br />Council member McGovern asked if there has been any further discussion with the <br />Livermore City Council regarding the noise monitoring equipment. <br /> <br />Mr. Fialho responded it has not been discussed at the Livermore City Council yet. It <br />should be scheduled for their discussion at their second meeting in October. <br /> <br />Councilmember Sullivan responded to Fred Norman's request during public comment <br />regarding the war in Iraq. He indicated he would support a community discussion <br />regarding the issue. He questioned if the balance of Council had any interest in doing <br />that. <br /> <br />Council member Brozosky indicated this is not an appropriate place for that kind of <br />discussion. He feels this is a place to do City business and the City does not have <br />influence over the war. If there is more time for meetings, the Council should be <br />discussing the General Plan in order to get it completed on time or discussing traffic <br />issues. To discuss things that come from the community that are not within the Council's <br />purview is not the right forum for that. It is not seying those topics are not legitimate; it is <br />just that this is not the right place for those discussions. <br /> <br />Councilmember Sullivan indicated he feels that Mr. Norman's request for a moment of <br />silence is certainly something that would be done. <br /> <br />City Council Minutes <br />Page 12 of 13 <br /> <br />September 19, 2006 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.