Laserfiche WebLink
<br />13.12, which would say "support Zone 7 in implementing its stream management master <br />plan so as to provide public access, trails and recreational opportunities." She also hoped <br />to see something in the programs that talked about working with the East Bay Regional <br />Park District and the cities of Livermore, Dublin and Sunol to develop trail linkages <br />between recreation and open space areas. She suggested adding Program 13.3 to say, <br />"Continue to coordinate with the East Bay Regional Park District and the cities of <br />Livermore, Dublin and Sunol to develop trail linkage for recreation and open space areas." <br /> <br />Mayor Hosterman decided to change the agenda and invited public comments at this time <br />on agenda items 2 and 3. <br /> <br />Nancy Allen, representing Danbury Park Homeowners Association, expressed concerns <br />about noise and safety issues from Valley Avenue. The Homeowners Association <br />opposed the proposed three left turn lanes onto Valley Avenue. The residents are willing <br />to live with a little back up if it deters the commuters. The Association was willing to work <br />with staff to find options that would provide a win/win for this situation. She also requested <br />reconsideration about the extension of Busch to EI Charro and additional turn lanes onto <br />Valley Avenue. Again, that is more traffic onto a corridor that was never planned to be a <br />key corridor. She suggested routing traffic onto Mohr Avenue. <br /> <br />Carol. Bush indicated she has lived in Pleasanton since 1968 and has seen the city grow <br />from 8,000 to about 68,000. She thanked Council for the wonderful parks and street <br />resurfacing. She acknowledged the change and expansion of the city. Her primary <br />concerns today were the extension of Stoneridge Drive, cut-through traffic and traffic flow. <br />She agreed with Ms. Allen about traffic problems on Valley Avenue. It is the primary <br />arterial that is four lanes from Bernal Avenue to Stanley Boulevard, so it is natural for <br />people heading to Livermore and other parts of the city to take that extension. She said <br />the extension of Stone ridge would go through a residential area, but so do all the other <br />routes. It was set up to go through a residential area the same as Valley Avenue. It goes <br />past shopping and a school and has not caused any major problems. Putting additional <br />traffic signals is not necessary because the stop signs work. If Stone ridge Drive is <br />extended, she was certain stop signs would work there as well without additional traffic <br />signals. She lives and works in Pleasanton and admitted she finds routes to cut through <br />the city to get to work. She listed various streets she would take to get through <br />Pleasanton from 1-580. She did not know what was meant by cut-through traffic since we <br />are all going somewhere, so we are cutting through town to get somewhere else. She <br />appreciated the comments about Kolin Avenue, which also affects Ms. Allen and the <br />Trimmingham group. There are many routes she takes that go through residential areas, <br />such as Ray Street. People use it to get to First Street when trying to avoid other <br />avenues. Rose, Neal, Angela, Kottinger, Vineyard, Mohr, and Greenwood are also cut- <br />through routes. Traffic flow is a major problem and she felt pollution could be reduced in <br />addition to improving traffic flow by doing something very simple like synchronizing the <br />signals. She supported the extension of Stoneridge Drive. <br /> <br />Kevin Close said he was happy to see the bypass road being considered an extension <br />instead of a street change. He addressed the open space issue and the Callippe Preserve <br />and noted the majority of the Spotorno property was in the open space area. He was <br />unaware if the Spotorno family had agreed to put their property into a conservatorship <br />similar to the Koopman property to prevent future development in the eastern hills. <br />Regarding public safety and the concern about roads being built in the 25% slope hillsides <br /> <br />General Plan Workshop Minutes <br /> <br />9 <br /> <br />August 29. 2006 <br />