CCMIN082906 - Laserfiche WebLink

or through fault and landslide areas, he did not know if there was discussion about what exactly is restricted. Is it housing or infrastructure? Heidi Massie indicated her backyard is adjacent to Valley Avenue. Traffic and noise has increased tremendously in the last six years. She opposed any lane changes to the Valley/Santa Rita or Valley/Stanley Avenues that would funnel more traffic through Valley Avenue. Most of her concerns had been outlined in e-mails contained in the staff report. She highlighted certain points such as the decline in the quality of life in her neighborhood, and the safety of children walking to Alisal School. She was very disappointed that the Stoneridge Drive extension is no longer being considered. Mayor Hosterman asked Director Wilson to address the safety concerns regarding children walking to Alisal School. Director Wilson talked about the ways to present concerns to the city through e-mails to the traffic division or the School Safety Committee, which can be reached through the school principal or the city. Staff would then go to the school to address problems. Council member Brozosky said the message to the community is that citizens don't have to wait until the end of the General Plan process to address safety issues. Jereen Gilbert did not think the School Safety Committee process was working. She has been on the committee for Alisal and Harvest Park for a few years and this issue is continually raised as a problem. On another issue, she agreed there is a need for a definition of cut-through traffic. She also agreed with Councilmember Brozosky that there is a need to clarify the assumptions because they are critical in making sure there is a good General Plan. In terms of the General Plan and the statement that when people buy houses, they count on it. When the Stone ridge extension was proposed, those homes were not built. All the homes being affected by traffic increases on Valley were already built. What has happened is by postponing the Stone ridge extension, the traffic flow has moved over. On Stoneridge Drive the lanes are nicely done, there is adequate middle space and the houses have a greater setback than any of the homes on Valley or Stanley. When people bought their homes, they knew Stoneridge would be going through. She has followed the Planning Commission recommendations and if the city has a Planning Department the taxpayers are paying for, then the Council should take their recommendations. Many people can't come to the Council meetings. She originally voted against the Stone ridge extension, but as she has become more educated on the subject, she has changed her mind. She believed other people would too. She did not think people using Stoneridge would be cut-through, but rather local traffic. She suggested looking at school vacation schedules, and believed when school is out the issue practically goes away. She felt there should be more credence in the traffic analysis since the staff preparing them are professionals and have no vested interests. She believed this was a sleeping giant issue; many people are going to wake up and become interested in this issue and come to Council to express their views. She listed many neighborhoods that are affected by this. Even if Stoneridge is extended she was concerned about future development. Valley Avenue and Stoneridge will be filled up even before adding a Home Depot, new houses, and a water park and a new hotel. She did not see how that was feasible in any city plan. She believed there is a bigger safety issue on Santa Rita than Council realizes. She has personally witnessed eight accidents involving children on bicycles being hit by cars. She said there are trucks going 60 mph between Valley and Stone ridge and that is unacceptable. Many accidents occur when vehicles turn right on General Plan Workshop Minutes 10 August29,2006