CCMIN062006 - Laserfiche WebLink

Mayor Hosterman invited public comments. There were no speakers. The public comment period was closed. Mr. Fialho asked for clarification on the language. Mr. Brozosky agreed that using ''will" was fine. The next step will be funding the project. The question may come up about how much the project will cost. He asked if costs of the project were discussed during the development of the ballot argument. This is moving it to the next step. Ms. McGovern noted that there will not be a "Grant Park" without the support of the public voting "yes", no matter how much money is available. Mr. Brozosky inquired if a fiscal analysis should be included in the ballot argument. Mr. Roush clarified that a fiscal analysis was not prepared along with this argument. It is not necessary. Mr. Fialho clarified that the Specific Plan was adopted and it does not have a financing component. Ms. McGovern asked that when this is printed, would it have the correct "measure" letter in the language. Ms. Seto clarified that the Alameda County Registrar of Voters sets the letter for the Measure. Ms. Seto read the language for the record. It was moved by Mr. Brozosky, seconded by Mr. Thorne to approve the following ballot argument: Argument in Favor of Measure _ A "yes" vote for Measure _ provides unique opportunities for Pleasanton residents of all ages. The 318-Acre Bernal "Grand Park" has been designed around a framework of woodlands, meadows and wetlands. The scenic Pleasanton ridge view corridor and the arroyo natural riparian habitats are protected. Trails and paths intertwine throughout the park and connect to regional trails. Cultural and rural heritage will be showcased through agricultural and Native American historical reflective areas. Open space will dominate the grand park concept. Community facilities such as lighted sports fields, an outdoor amphitheater, children's play areas, outdoor basketball courts, a teen/community center and cultural arts facilities including a theater, art classrooms, gallery and rehearsal space will be clustered to maximize open space and the sharing of facilities, while minimizing infrastructure costs. This vision for the 318-acre Bernal "Grand Park" is reflected in the Bernal Property Phase "Land Use Plan. This plan was approved unanimously by the City Council on May 16, 2006. There has been significant involvement from various stakeholders throughout the community including the Parks and Recreation Commission, Planning Commisaion, Civic Arts Commission and Youth Commission. Members of various sports groups, Pleasanton City Council Minutes 14 06/20/06