My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
CCMIN062006
City of Pleasanton
>
CITY CLERK
>
MINUTES
>
2000-2009
>
2006
>
CCMIN062006
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/17/2007 10:56:44 AM
Creation date
6/16/2006 11:06:01 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
MINUTES
DOCUMENT DATE
6/20/2006
DOCUMENT NO
CCMIN062006
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
16
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />It was moved by Ms. McGovern, seconded by Mr. Brozosky to approve the PUD <br />application with the following conditions: that the Clty-owned property Is maintained by <br />the homeowners association; the Emergency Vehicle Access (EVA) connection to <br />Montevino Drive shall be moved as far as possible from the Lloyd's residence; second <br />units shall be permitted uses; a quick completion of the extension of Clara Lane to the <br />Hatsushl property is urged; and secondary units are to include kitchens. <br /> <br />Ms. McGovern asked how the coordination between Clara Lane and EVA be used as <br />short a period of time as possible <br /> <br />Mr. Iserson sated that the applicant is encouraged to work with the property owner to the <br />east to develop Clara Lane as soon as possible. <br /> <br />The roll call vote was taken as follows: <br />AYES: Council members - Broz08ky, McGovern, and Thorne <br />NOES: None <br />ABSENT: Councilmember - Sullivan <br />ABSTAINED: None <br />RECUSED: Mayor Hosterman <br /> <br />6d <br />ADDroval of Direct Araument in Favor of the Bernal ProDertY Phase II Land Use Plan <br />Initiative (SR 06:166) <br /> <br />Larissa Seto, Assistant City Attorney presented the staff report. <br /> <br />Mayor Hosterman thanked Councilmembers Thorne and McGovern for their time and <br />effort for developing the ballot language. She asked for clarification as to how land use items <br />are presented to the voters. The description of the proposed project is good. <br /> <br />Mr. Brozosky said that the use of the term "community park" as used in the ballot <br />argument may be confusing since the Measure excludes the earlier approved community park. <br /> <br />Mr. Thorne noted that earlier language used "Grand Park". <br /> <br />Ms. McGovern suggested using Bernal Property Park or Bernal Park. She noted that it <br />is important to include Bernal in the name for familiarity. <br /> <br />Mr. Brozosky suggested the use of "Grand Park". <br /> <br />Mayor Hosterman asked if the intent would be to replace "Grand Park" with "Community <br />Park" throughout the document. <br /> <br />Mr. Brozosky suggested that Bernal Grand Park be inserted in three locations. He also <br />suggested replacing "will be" with "could be" in the sections concerning actual resources. <br /> <br />Ms. McGovern noted that it was obvious in the plan language that agricultural and Native <br />American areas were going to happen and therefore the use of "will be" would be appropriate. <br /> <br />Pleasanton City Council <br />Minutes <br /> <br />12 <br /> <br />06/20/06 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.