CCMIN062006 - Laserfiche WebLink

Ron Lloyd, a Pleasanton resident, stated that his home is closest to the proposed development. He likes the open space but he is impacted by some parts of the project. He would like to acquire and landscape the remaining portion of the land. He has concerns about the EVA being used for construction use. He is concerned about losing his view of the valley. He asked Council not to approve the project, unless there is a specific time frame to stop using the EVA for construction. On Lot 13 he would like a further setback for privacy purpose and a reduction in the peak height of the home to 18 It so that his view is not lost. John Pedersen, a Pleasanton resident, is worried about traffic; he would like to see Clara Lane completed before the construction begins. Frank Jardin, a Pleasanton resident, lives on Clara Lane and has already endured a year and half of construction traffic. Ron Cote, a Pleasanton resident, commented on the high speed on Montevino Drive and on the dust from previous construction projects in the area. If the EVA is used for construction purposes, more accidents will occur. He suggested that the project get built by using Clara Lane or Vineyard Ave. Mr. Iserson clarified the City's role of maintaining the landscaping. Scott Ratti, a Pleasanton resident, supported the project. Fred Musser, a Pleasanton resident, supported the project. The City did a good job in approving the specific plan and the Hatsushis have endured the development of many other projects in the area. Ralph Hughes supported the project. He stated that reasonable people have differing perspectives. Previous Council supported this development, and determined that it is in the best interest of the City. He commented on the use of the EVA and the proximity of the EVA to the Lloyd property. The project has not changed since its initial adoption. He commented on the speeding on Montevino and height issues in the project. Councilmember Thorne closed the public hearing. Mr. Brozosky asked if there was any way to move the EVA away from the Lloyd residence. Mr. Iserson said yes and staff will endeavor to move it as far away as possible. He indicated it might be good to add a condition to address this. Mr. Brozosky asked why the City is holding on to the remnant parcel. Mr. Iserson stated it was left over from another development. Mr. Brozosky asked if there is any connection through the nursery property itself. Mr. Iserson said no. Pleasanton City Council Minutes 11 06120/06