My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
CCMIN102505
City of Pleasanton
>
CITY CLERK
>
MINUTES
>
2000-2009
>
2005
>
CCMIN102505
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/17/2007 10:56:42 AM
Creation date
10/20/2005 3:09:28 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
MINUTES
DOCUMENT DATE
10/25/2005
DOCUMENT NO
CCMIN102505
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
14
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />Ms. Greenberg said they had tried to find another business park that had <br />undergone this kind of transformation. Instead they found many business parks at a <br />similar point to Hacienda and the surrounding communities were contemplating <br />changes for many of the same reasons present in Pleasanton. The consultants then <br />looked at more traditional urban areas that have some of the transportation and travel <br />characteristics that are of interest for encouragement in Pleasanton. These are places <br />that have managed to grow, add jobs, housing, and activities without having big <br />increases in traffic. The team extracted many lessons and principles from these areas. <br />Mr. Blank said since no other business park has made this transition, he felt <br />there was a risk factor. <br />Ms. Greenberg said they had made a list of factors to determine what would be <br />transferable to this location. There are some pieces such as a high quality-walking <br />environment, which can be reproduced in Hacienda. Another piece is regional <br />accessibility. The places that have been most successful without adding development <br />without adding traffic have transit systems that connect to many places in the region. <br />Pleasanton scores poorly in that regard and that is really hard to change. <br />Mr. Blank asked how to gauge what is transferable and what is not if there is no <br />real world experience in a business park environment? <br />Ms. Greenberg said it is based on substantial research on travel behavior. For <br />example, if there is great access to BART that only helps people whose business <br />destination is accessible from BART. <br />Mr. Blank then asked what data was used to create the critical mass numbers <br />shown on the slides? <br />Ms. Greenberg said there is a considerable body of data that shows for example <br />the "decay factor". Many people will walk a quarter mile, but the numbers drop off <br />substantially for longer distances. There is also quite a bit of quantitative data on the <br />response people have to parking charges. There is much data of interest when <br />discussing the different strategies for the area. <br />Mr. Haskell said the slide with points about critical mass was an economic study <br />focusing on the definition of a mixed-use building and how it works, whether it is <br />proximate to transit or any other context. Getting a mixed-use building to work is a <br />challenge. The economic consultants did the research on actual retail and market <br />studies. This whole proposal will not work without successful mixed uses. This is <br />based on a retail market study for the community and taking into account the focus <br />desired for the project. <br />Mr. Sullivan said several retail and transit studies have been done and are on the <br />Hacienda Business Park website. He wanted to clarify something. On one hand he <br />heard nothing has been done like this before and on the other there is a lot of data <br />Joint Workshop <br />City Council/Planning Commission 3 10/25/05 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.