My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
CCMIN102505
City of Pleasanton
>
CITY CLERK
>
MINUTES
>
2000-2009
>
2005
>
CCMIN102505
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/17/2007 10:56:42 AM
Creation date
10/20/2005 3:09:28 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
MINUTES
DOCUMENT DATE
10/25/2005
DOCUMENT NO
CCMIN102505
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
14
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />Mr. Haskell said they did not want to constrain traffic on Owens Drive, but rather <br />to improve sidewalks, street trees, etc. to get a better way to walk to the BART station. <br />He liked the idea of a north/south pedestrian connection. Part of the nature of a transit- <br />oriented development is to not to created separate and discrete uses. <br />Jennifer Pearce asked about the profile of the self-selectors in terms of people <br />who would be living in this area. <br />Ellen Greenberg, Freedman, Tung & Bottomley, 74 New Montgomery Street, <br />Suite 300, San Francisco, responded the self-selectors would be households seeking <br />urban environments with convenient living without dependence on auto travel for <br />various trips. There would be many seniors in this group, but more likely they will be <br />young working people who see this as convenient to work and who value the amenities <br />of a city like Pleasanton for its parks, recreational opportunities, trails and with a great <br />access via BART to more urban places. She noted the principals of transit-oriented <br />development (TOD) act out differently in every place. <br />Ms. Pearce referred to Pleasant Hill as an example of TOD and asked for further <br />elaboration. <br />Richard Lee, of Fehr & Peers, One Walnut Creek Center, 100 Pringle Avenue, <br />Suite 600, Walnut Creek, referred to the census data for Pleasanton in 2000 and noted <br />there was no residential development near the BART station in Pleasanton. He then <br />referred to Pleasant Hill where there are residences nearer the BART station. <br />Mary Roberts said the demographics presented appear to focus on younger <br />people with no families or children, since there is no focus on school issues. It seems to <br />be very different than Pleasanton as a whole. She noted the transportation studies <br />would be dependent on that type of demographic. <br />Mr. Haskell agreed this is different than Pleasanton and noted those are the self- <br />selectors who would most likely live in that area. <br />Ms. Roberts commented the Pleasanton staff performed a traffic study of the <br />occupants of the Archstone Apartments and felt it would be interesting to review that. <br />Many people appeared to be traveling south. She felt it would be interesting to see how <br />many people from the apartments actually walked to BART or to work. <br />Mr. Iserson said staff would locate the information and bring it back to a future <br />meeting. <br />Philip Blank referred to the information presented on other TOD projects that are <br />under construction and asked if information had been compiled from TOD projects that <br />are actually completed? <br />Joint Workshop <br />City Council/Planning Commission 2 10/25/05 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.