My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
CCMIN092705
City of Pleasanton
>
CITY CLERK
>
MINUTES
>
2000-2009
>
2005
>
CCMIN092705
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/17/2007 10:56:42 AM
Creation date
9/23/2005 9:37:54 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
MINUTES
DOCUMENT DATE
9/27/2005
DESTRUCT DATE
15 Y
DOCUMENT NO
CCMIN092705
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
11
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />and jobslhousing balance, there could be developed a structure by which to consider the <br />presentations of individual projects. <br /> James Paxson, 4473 Willow Road, Suite 105, responded to some concerns expressed <br />about the workshop devoted to Hacienda Business Park. The intention of the business <br />owners was not to present a specific plan nor alternatives at this point. Until there is direction <br />from this body on what it envisions for the process and what it wants to see, the owners do not <br />have much to present in terms of actual projects. What they do want to present is a good deal <br />of background information on development alternatives. They have done a lot of background <br />research and they want to present that information to the Council and Commission to help the <br />body make informed decisions and to give direction about the types of projects that are <br />desired in that area. <br /> Kevin Close, 871 Sycamore Road, wanted further definition of certain terms. With <br />regard to the housing cap, he asked what is a housing unit and how many are left? It seems <br />that response from staff will not come before the fourth meeting. He asked what is gross <br />density. Is it all the acreage or density at the site of development? He also wanted circulation <br />kept in mind when considering all these things. <br /> There were no other speakers. <br />4. NEXT STEPS AND MATTERS INITIATED BY COUNCIL OR COMMISSION <br /> Nelson Fialho suggested that the body reach consensus on the ten or so issues raised <br />before setting further workshops. He also wanted discussion about condensing the schedule <br />of workshops. Even though there are nine workshops, there are really only five after this one. <br />The last three are for staff to present the draft element as a result of the discussions to that <br />point, traffic modeling, and the last workshop would be to determine the preferred draft <br />circulation element. Two of the workshops are for presentations regarding Hacienda and <br />Staples. There are significant economic and residential considerations at a policy level that <br />will directly impact the General Plan and should be reviewed before embarking on discussions <br />of citywide land use issues. He acknowledged it seems overwhelming, but there is a purpose <br />and staff would try to keep presentations and discussions as short as possible. <br /> Mr. Brozosky did not feel direction would be given to staff until all matters had been <br />presented. He asked staff at which workshop would things be prioritized and directions given <br />for them to start working on the draft land use element? <br /> Ms. Stern understood the desire to look at everything first and felt it would be about <br />workshop #6 before directions could be given to staff for preparation of the draft plan. <br /> Mr. Brozosky referred to the need for prioritizing and felt it should be done in a way that <br />least impacts the traffic in the city. He felt there was no problem with more people in the city, <br />but with the congestion and traffic that comes with housing development. <br />Joint Workshop <br />City Council/Planning Commission 9 09/27/05 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.