My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
CCMIN092705
City of Pleasanton
>
CITY CLERK
>
MINUTES
>
2000-2009
>
2005
>
CCMIN092705
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/17/2007 10:56:42 AM
Creation date
9/23/2005 9:37:54 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
MINUTES
DOCUMENT DATE
9/27/2005
DESTRUCT DATE
15 Y
DOCUMENT NO
CCMIN092705
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
11
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br /> Mabel Terra Lester, 11033 Dublin Canyon Road, said she has been trying to develop <br />her property for seven years and would like to move forward with it. This property has been in <br />her family since 1916. Her property was #25 on the map. <br /> Mike Regan, 1363 Hearst Drive, acknowledged the General Plan Update is an <br />overwhelming and sometimes frustrating process for all. As a citizen, he thanked them for the <br />process and it was worthwhile taking the necessary time. There is a housing cap of 29,000 <br />units and there are important decisions to be made. He has learned a lot by participating in <br />this process. He believed the Circulation Element is the prerequisite for anything to be done in <br />this process. That determines options and the quality of life for the residents. Affordable <br />housing and assisted living facilities should be a priority to allow people to continue to live in <br />the community. He wanted a holistic approach to the plan to weigh the impacts of each project <br />on the surrounding area. He agreed with Mr. Brozosky that it would be helpful to have a <br />central compilation of information, so everyone has the same data. <br /> Michael Knuppe, 2899 Vizzolini Court, owner of property #22 on the map expressed his <br />desire that the children, teachers, police, fire personnel, city employees, etc. be able to afford <br />to live in Pleasanton. He referred to page 2 of the staff report, bullet 6, relationship of jobs and <br />housing, and he wanted a survey of city employees, teachers, etc. to see who currently lives <br />here, would like to live here, what they think would be an affordable housing price, etc. All this <br />information should be included in future land planning. It may affect density; perhaps 15 units <br />per acre is too low? Do we want all of our workers to commute into the city? He also wanted <br />to know how many emergency response personnel live in the city. If there is a major <br />earthquake and the city is isolated, can these people get to the city to serve the citizens? He <br />did not want Pleasanton to become known as an elitist community. <br /> Scott Trobbe, 1690 Dell Avenue, Campbell, owner of property designated as #43 on the <br />map (1-680 and Bernal), indicated several discussions have been had about changing the <br />property from commercial to some other use. He supported this process because it gives him <br />an opportunity to be proactive about the use of his property. He indicated he would like to <br />have some kind of retail use, such as a high-end grocer, boutiques, restaurants, etc., at that <br />corner and will commence discussions with city staff. <br /> Becky Dennis, 838 Gray Fox Circle, suggested holding a workshop to prioritize land <br />uses. Some are a higher priority for the city than others and she felt they should be given a <br />right to use existing and planned infrastructure first. She indicated she was an affordable <br />housing advocate and she felt the housing deficit in this area should be a priority for <br />consideration. She acknowledged there is a housing cap, but it could be increased by the <br />voters. She noted affordable housing has the most difficult time in being accepted by the <br />community because it brings no benefit, such as parks, other than as a community investment <br />in work force housing and in housing those with lower income who live here. She hoped the <br />Council would make the kind of sites that can accommodate that missing type of housing a <br />priority. Council should consider land use prioritization that considers housing type and <br />density, the overarching issue of jobs/housing balance, impact on circulation, impact on other <br />infrastructure like schools, sewer capacity, etc. If there is a workshop just to discuss the <br />community's priorities and the management of the community in terms of fair share housing <br />Joint Workshop <br />City Council/Planning Commission 8 09/27/05 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.