My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
CCMIN092705
City of Pleasanton
>
CITY CLERK
>
MINUTES
>
2000-2009
>
2005
>
CCMIN092705
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/17/2007 10:56:42 AM
Creation date
9/23/2005 9:37:54 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
MINUTES
DOCUMENT DATE
9/27/2005
DESTRUCT DATE
15 Y
DOCUMENT NO
CCMIN092705
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
11
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />Mr. Sullivan agreed it was a good idea to talk about priorities. He was uncertain at what <br />point that should occur, but should be done before decisions are made. He acknowledged <br />traffic is a major concern, but he believed there were other considerations as well, and <br />decisions should not be made based just on traffic. <br />Mr. Fialho suggested inserting discussion about priorities after the Hacienda workshop <br />in order to focus subsequent discussions on land use with regard to citywide issues. <br />Mr. Brozosky felt the priorities discussion should be before the Hacienda and Staples <br />presentations. <br />Mr. Fialho disagreed because there are significant economic and residential impacts <br />that will directly affect policy decisions that relate to the General Plan. He felt it was important <br />to have that information presented publicly so the community is aware of the issues as Council <br />is making its policy decisions and prioritization. <br />Ms. McGovern inquired about secondary units and assisted living units. She wanted to <br />know if the number of units meets the regional requirements for affordable housing. She said <br />her decisions would be based on whether she can count those units towards her goals. She <br />asked if there would be notices in the newspapers that encouraged landowners to contact the <br />Planning Director if there are any development proposals, since the Council is reviewing land <br />use. <br />Mr. Fialho felt staff did a very good job in terms of public notices. There is a very <br />comprehensive notification strategy on the city's website and there will also be information in <br />the city's newsletters. <br />Ms. McGovern was very concerned that if consideration is being given to rezoning <br />commercial land to residential and there are people who own land that is residential that will be <br />impacted by that, that they be informed. She did not want people coming back to say they <br />have had their land rights taken away. She asked what happens if another developer besides <br />Hacienda and Staples wants to have a workshop? <br />Mr. Fialho felt the difference is that the Hacienda and Staples properties are being <br />viewed in a different light. These have a major economic component and Staples has a senior <br />housing component that is about 700 units. Hacienda is different because commercial <br />property is being considered for changing to Transit Oriented Development (TOD). That is a <br />dramatic shift from past Council positions. He did not feel these kinds of issues would be <br />apparent in other projects in the city. <br />Ms. McGovern would like to take the approximate 2,500 units left to reach the housing <br />cap and then decide what are the types of land uses and housing needed to finish this town at <br />build out. That is why she asked about goals. She wanted to meet the goals of different age <br />groups, especially young adults. There are fewer young families and she wanted to make <br />certain there is a diversified community in terms of age. Her last issues involved regional <br />Joint Workshop <br />City Council/Planning Commission 10 09/27/05 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.