Laserfiche WebLink
Mr. Sullivan asked if these groups had talked to the neighbors of the area to get <br />input on the proposed plan? <br /> <br /> Mr. Krause said they did not, but felt that having an arts center farther away <br />would be better than plans that show it closer to the neighborhoods. <br /> <br /> Mr. Brozosky asked if they thought there was enough room for the cultural arts <br />center and parking? <br /> <br /> Mr. Krause believed there was. This is a 9.2-acre parcel and the Senior Center <br />is on seven acres, with five of those acres being park. There is not room for an <br />amphitheater with everything else, but he felt comfortable there was enough room for <br />the cultural arts center. <br /> <br /> Mr. Reznick believed the parking for the sports fields could be expanded a little <br />and would easily accommodate the two facilities. <br /> <br /> Les Duman, 7567 Olive Drive, representing the Pleasanton Community Concert <br />Band, indicated part of performing arts is outdoor performances. He felt it was not a <br />good idea to put the performing arts center, especially an amphitheater, next to the <br />freeway. Berms and other mitigations have not shown to be effective in that area. He <br />agreed having the center close to downtown was a benefit to the community. He said it <br />was possible there could be a sporting event, performing arts event, and an <br />amphitheater event on the same day and he felt it was best to have these venues as far <br />from residences as possible. With regard to parking, by putting the center in the <br />triangular area, it seems possible to shift the center twenty yards to provide a few <br />hundred more parking spaces. That would not reduce the open space. He noted the <br />Community Band had played at many other locations, including Sacramento, and noted <br />band members spend money on meals before and after events and that would be good <br />for the businesses in Pleasanton and the tax base of Pleasanton. <br /> <br /> Bill Nandor, 2698 Gapwall Court, speaking for the tennis community, indicated <br />there is a need for public lighted courts. Currently, players who want to play in the <br />evening must go out of town to find lighted courts. There is a beautiful tennis park in <br />Pleasanton, but the courts are usually unavailable because they are being used for <br />lessons and clinics. He noted the poor condition of the Muirwood tennis courts and <br />those at the Pleasanton Middle School. He urged Council to incorporate tennis courts <br />on the Bernal property plans. <br /> <br /> Andrew Whelan, 201 Fallon Place, Clayton, representing Assemblyman Guy <br /> Houston, expressed Mr. Houston's support and enthusiasm for the direction of the park <br /> plans, specifically with regard to lighted sports fields. Mr. Whelan indicated as he grew <br /> up in the area, having sports fields was a major component of the quality of life that <br /> Pleasanton is known for. <br /> <br /> Cy Matin, 874 Bonde Court, referred to Plan A, and pointed to an area where <br /> tennis courts could be constructed. <br /> <br /> Joint Workshop <br /> City Council and Parks and Recreation Commission <br /> 3 05/12/05 <br /> <br /> <br />