My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
CCMIN021505
City of Pleasanton
>
CITY CLERK
>
MINUTES
>
2000-2009
>
2005
>
CCMIN021505
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/17/2007 10:56:41 AM
Creation date
3/16/2005 3:55:11 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
MINUTES
DOCUMENT DATE
2/15/2005
DOCUMENT NO
CCMIN021505
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
21
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
__ Bernal property and the staff report indicates that this is possible. She mentioned that <br /> she has been approached about the possibility for a lighted basketball court. She <br /> believed there are other potential uses that could be discussed that relate to sports that <br /> are not currently included in the design plans. She asked staff if the western portion of <br /> the Bernal property and the knoll would be considered at some point during this process. <br /> <br /> Mr. Sullivan asked if the western portion of the Bernal property and the knoll area <br /> is a part of this process. <br /> <br /> Mr. Fialho said yes. The knoll area is adjacent to the Valley Avenue underpass <br /> and the entire west section of the Bernal property. <br /> <br /> Mr. Wolfe said that if Council combines both processes, it might consider the <br /> knoll area and the entire western section of the Bemal property as a community park. <br /> Staff has only been focusing on the 50-acre community park. If Council chooses to <br /> include the first draft Park Master Plan prepared by RRM Design, he asked Council to <br /> include it in its motion. <br /> <br /> Mr. Brozosky amended his motion, agreed to by Mr. Sullivan, to include <br /> directing staff to forward the first draft Park Master Plan design prepared by RRM <br /> Design Group and the third revised draft Park Master Plan design prepared by <br /> M.D. Fotheringham to the Commissions to review and provide comments. <br /> <br /> Ms. McGovern believed it is important for people who are considering buying a <br />-- home near the western portion of the Bemal property to understand what is going to <br /> occur with this piece of property. <br /> <br /> Mr. Brozosky wondered why the Civic Arts Commission was not included in step <br /> six of Option One to jointly review and make, with the Parks and Recreation <br /> Commission, recommendations to the Council regarding the Community Park PUD plan. <br /> <br /> Mr. Wolfe said that one of the reasons that the Parks and Recreation <br /> Commission has been made a focus is because historically, the Commission has had <br /> purview over park development and has been responsible for making a direct <br /> recommendation to the Council. The feeling is that the Civic Arts Commission and the <br /> other Commissions will have the opportunity to provide input early on in the process. <br /> Ultimately, one of the responsibilities of the Parks and Recreation Commission is to <br /> make recommendations directly to Council as it relates to park development. <br /> <br /> The roll call vote was taken as follows: <br /> AYES: Councilmembers - Brozosky, McGovern, Sullivan, and Mayor <br /> Hosterman <br /> NOES: None <br /> ABSENT: None <br /> ABSTAIN: None <br /> <br /> Pleasanton City Council 10 02/15/05 <br /> Minutes <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.