My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
CCMIN011805
City of Pleasanton
>
CITY CLERK
>
MINUTES
>
2000-2009
>
2005
>
CCMIN011805
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/17/2007 10:56:40 AM
Creation date
1/12/2005 2:42:13 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
MINUTES
DOCUMENT DATE
1/18/2005
DOCUMENT NO
CCMIN011805
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
20
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
the traffic data and analysis that meets staff's approval will be incorporated into the <br />actual traffic model runs. He noted that Fehr & Peers would be the transportation <br />engineers on this project. <br /> <br /> Ms. McGovem was confused as to the roll the East Bay Community Foundation <br />will have in this project. <br /> <br /> Ms. Brooks said that this project, entitled the "Livable Communities Initiative," <br />was started in 1999 by board members of the Foundation as they saw the challenges <br />that communities in the East Bay were facing. The East Bay Community Foundation is <br />involved in advocacy at some level in what it believes are good strategies to address <br />traffic problems, affordable housing and other quality of life issues in communities. The <br />East Bay Community Foundation receives funding for this project from other larger, <br />private foundations that are also investing in this type of work. <br /> <br /> Ms. McGovern asked if the East Bay Community Foundation is receiving money <br />from other foundations that are supporting Livable Communities throughout the United <br />States. <br /> <br /> Ms. Brooks said yes. This also connects the Foundation with a wide network of <br />people throughout the country. <br /> <br /> Ms. McGovern pointed out that the proposed cost for the plan preparation is <br />estimated at $350,000. She asked Mr. Paxson if Hacienda Business Park was counting <br />on Council to approve this project based on these projected costs? <br /> <br /> Mr. Paxson said Hacienda understands that it needs to demonstrate to the <br />Council that what it is bringing forward is something that it can support. He noted that <br />Hacienda is starting out at specific plan lower case and hopefully, moving to specific <br />plan upper case that actually becomes adopted as part of the City's General Plan. <br /> <br /> While the work program report is extensive, Ms. McGovern said she still has <br />questions such as what parcels are being considered, who are the core owners that are <br />interested in having their land redeveloped, how many core owners are there and where <br />are they located throughout the Business Park, and what happens to the amount of <br />commercial space that may be removed, as she did not want to have traffic by adding <br />more commercial and residential spaces. Based on these questions, she could not <br />support this project. <br /> <br /> Mr. Paxson said the Specific Plan is designed to cover the entire Business Park, <br /> as Hacienda believes it has to make the project work as a whole. The core planning <br /> area that is identified in the scope of work primarily centers around three parcels located <br /> next to the BART station, including the BART property, the Shaklee property to the south <br /> and the Roch property. There are some additional areas along the south side of West <br /> Las Positas that are also included in the core planning area. The Specific Plan is <br /> designed to integrate these areas with the entire Business Park. <br /> <br /> As the City approaches its housing cap, Ms. McGovem asked how many <br /> residential units Hacienda Business Park is proposing to add? <br /> <br /> Pleasanton City Council 5 01/18/05 <br /> Minutes <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.