CCMIN010405 - Laserfiche WebLink

James Frost, a Pleasanton resident, addressed Cound~l regarding the encroachment of a riparian easement in the Bridle Creek Development. He noted that there are other issues besides the easement encroachment and there is also significant failure to follow PUD 97-03 regarding the plan approval, setback and other items within Lot 105. He asked Council for its support and to help the residents of Bridle Creek resolve this issue. Nelson Fialho, City Manager, said staff would follow up with Mr. Frost on this matter. Eric Krieger, representing Nolan Farms Association, informed Council that it opposes any plan to extend Rose Street through to Valley Avenue. The Association would like an opportunity to discuss this later when the General Plan update workshops are conducted. The Association's ultimate goal is to remove any potential extension of Rose Street through Valley Avenue from the General Plan. Kevin Close, a Happy Valley resident, asked if a study for the bypass road was in progress, and does the development include the bypass road as outlined in the Happy Valley Specific Plan? He believed it would be appropriate to have the traffic situations solved before the golf course opens. Michelle Hovey and several students of the Amador Valley High School Drawing Class presented a mural, which would cover the graffiti that is on the wall of the Main Street Bridge. The mural would beautify the area and send a message to the community -- of respect and compassion while capturing the feeling of Pleasanton. Mike Regan, speaking on behalf of the Kottinger Ranch Homeowners Association, expressed the Association's continued support for the good work that is being done on the General Plan. The Association continues to express its continued opposition to building projects in the south Pleasanton hills as there are significant issues related to traffic, drainage and flood control, impacts to the schools, and the qualify of life that is afforded in Pleasanton. Preservation of the open space and hillsides are also important to this community. The build out of the City and the impacts these projects may have to affordable housing may be not be the right trade off for Pleasanton at this time. There are a number of traffic intersections where the level of service is unacceptable and until addressed, the Association believes Council should preclude these projects from moving forward. There were no other speakers. 6. PUBLIC HEARINGS AND OTHER MATTERS Item 6a PUD-40~ R.J. Wilson/Mardel~ LLC (SR 05:007) Application for PUD development plan a.,~)roval to construct an am)roximatelv 3,464-square-foot sin;lle-stor~ home with a loft on an existin¢l 1.675-acre ~ortion of a 22.28-acre lot located west of 2500 Vineyard Avenue~ in the Vineyard Avenue Corridor Specific Plan Area. Zonin;I for the property is PUD-LDPJOS (Planned Unit Development - Low Density Residential/Open Space) and Community Park District. Pleasanton City Council 5 01/04/05 Minutes