My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
CCMIN042004
City of Pleasanton
>
CITY CLERK
>
MINUTES
>
2000-2009
>
2004
>
CCMIN042004
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/17/2007 10:56:39 AM
Creation date
4/13/2004 5:07:07 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
MINUTES
DOCUMENT DATE
4/20/2004
DOCUMENT NO
CCMIN042004
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
10
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
residential Green Building Ordinance. It is also consistent with the Pleasanton Energy <br />Plan approved in 2003 and with the direction the committee is taking. The Energy <br />Committee reviewed the program where it was unanimously recommended for approval <br />by the City Council. This is a rare opportunity to implement a program that will satisfy a <br />number of different goals in the direction groups are seeking to achieve. <br /> <br />There were no further speakers and the public hearing was closed. <br /> <br />It was moved by Ms. Hosterman, seconded by Mr. Campbell, to approve Resolution <br />No. 04-020, Approving the Allocation of Federal and City Funds Relative to the <br />Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) Program for Fiscal Year 2004 <br />(2004-05) on the condition that the resolution include that the GRID program would <br />be available for any low income families that would be eligible for the program. <br /> <br />The roll call vote was taken as follows: <br />AYES: Councilmember - Ayala, Brozosky, Campbell, Hosterman and Mayor <br /> <br /> Pico <br />NOES: None <br />ABSENT: None <br />ABSTAIN: None <br /> <br />d. Mid-Year 2003-04 Financial Update Report (SR 04:087) <br /> <br />Sue Rossi presented the staff report. <br /> <br />Mr. Brozosky asked why the replacement fund was being used before the temporary <br />recession reserve fund. He thought that the recession reserve fund was to be used first, <br />since the money has been put aside. <br /> <br />Ms. Rossi said that could be done. She proposed to look first at the replacement reserve <br />because it is updated every two years and it will be updated soon. Reserves are looked at <br />over a very long time (30 years) and have more flexibility than the temporary recession <br />reserve, which is intended to be a short time use of funds. <br /> <br />Mr. Brozosky said he understood this to be an information only report that is telling <br />Council there are options available and at the point recommendations are necessary, <br />Council will receive further information. <br /> <br />Ms. Rossi said that is correct. The report in front of them addresses those options at this <br />point. <br /> <br />Ms. Hosterman asked about recreation fees and the decrease in revenue fee projections <br />based on participation levels. <br /> <br />Ms. McKeehan said this happens because of the variety of classes offered and some of <br />the classes generate more interest than others. <br /> <br />Pleasanton City Council 10 04.20.04 <br />Minutes <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.