Laserfiche WebLink
noise volume to EBRPD. He noted that EBRPD is willing to work with the community <br />to mitigate the noise level. <br /> <br /> Ms. Ayala believed the information provided to the public mentioned a total of 23 <br />water slides. <br /> <br /> Ms. Knutson said she did not know where those numbers came from, as they are <br />incorrect. At full build out of the water park, there would be a total of 17 water slides. <br /> <br />Ms. Ayala was mostly interested in Phase I. <br /> <br /> Ms. Kuntson said that Phase I would consist of the four existing water slides, four <br />new water slides, the circle racer, and two other body slides for a total of 14 water slides. <br /> <br /> Ms. Ayala asked California Splash to consider while Council was taking public <br />input, whether the total number of 14 water slides for Phase I could be reduced. <br /> <br /> Tim Neal, Chief of Police, introduced Norman Lapera, Chief of Police of the East <br />Bay Regional Park District. ChiefNeal mentioned that the Pleasanton Police Department <br />works with the EBRPD police deparhnent on a daily basis as they police the Pleasanton <br />Ridge and Shadow Cliffs. <br /> <br /> Mr. Brozosky mentioned that a report was submitted to Council regarding the <br />Concord water slides park. He asked Mr. Lapera to explain that report and to identify <br />and explain what types of calls the Concord Police Department receives related to the <br />water park. <br /> <br /> ChiefNeal noted that Council received a letter fi.om Mr. Gary Smith, a Pleasanton <br />resident that listed all calls received for services for Concord's water park. In raw <br />numbers it would be appear to be large as it entails every single police response. He <br />mentioned that Chief Lapera had Concord police distill those calls to determine what in <br />fact were crimes and police responses. <br /> <br /> Based upon Mr. Smith's letter, Chief Lapera stated that he contacted the Concord <br />Chief of Police and asked him what were the actual events that occurred in 2003. The <br />Concord Chief of Police had his crime analyst pull all of the information for 2003. The <br />total number of calls for service in the year 2003 to the water park was 93. The Concord <br />Chief of Police broke down the crimes by different penal code sections, and primarily <br />there were four simple batteries, roughly 17 petty thefts, six thefts greater than $400, four <br />vandalisms, two burglaries, one stolen car, and a few traffic related incidents. The vast <br />majority of the calls were 911 hang-ups. The Concord Fire Depa~hnent also responded to <br />a few calls related to personal injuries. The characterization of the Park as a high crime <br />area is incorrect and calls for services actually was small. He mentioned that ChiefNeal <br />and he discussed what a city like Pleasanton would receive for calls for service such as <br />from a shopping mall. <br /> <br />Pleasanton City Council 20 03/16/04 <br />Minutes <br /> <br /> <br />