Laserfiche WebLink
Chief Neal pointed out that Chief Lapera's department has primary jurisdiction at <br />the water park but inevitably, the Pleasanton Police Department does respond either at the <br />District's request or by initiating activities. He reviewed the calls for police response to <br />Shadow Cliffs for the year 2003 and noted that the Pleasanton Police Department <br />responded 44 times; seven of those incidents were traffic stops, six were animal related <br />calls, and six formal outside requests from EBRPD's police. The most serious crime was <br />a burglary report and there were no assaults. The Pleasanton Police Department does not <br />view the water park as a significant crime problem. The most significant policing <br />problem the water park presents is on holiday weekends and hot weather days where <br />overflow parking onto Stanley Boulevard becomes the number one problem. This project <br />proposes significant additional parking. When viewing a project similar to this water <br />park, police protocol is to look at a comparable facility in a similar community. A <br />comparable facility will not necessarily be an indicator as to what happens in Pleasanton <br />unless one finds a comparable community because a 7-Eleven coming to Pleasanton is <br />not necessarily what a 7-Eleven coming to Hayward will be in terms of police service. <br />He noted that Stoneridge Mall prompts the Pleasanton Police Department to respond <br />between 1500 to 2000 times a year and generates between 350 to 500 arrests a year. <br />Those figures are 50 percent of what the San Leandro Police Department experiences <br />with Bay Fair Mall. He believed that Stoneridge Mall was one of the safest malls in <br />California. He pointed out that any amenity that was added to Pleasanton would generate <br />crime. The question is whether it will be a tolerable amount of crime, and will it create a <br />hardship and become a burden or a nuisance, or create violate crime? He did not believe <br />this would be the case for California Splash. He mentioned that he has been involved in <br />speculative analysis for projects as small as the skateboard Park in Tmcy and as large as <br />the Shoreline Amphitheater in Mountain View. He anticipated that the expansion of the <br />water park could cause the amount of calls for service that Pleasanton Police Department <br />receives to double to roughly 88. He pointed out that each of the high schools generates <br />about 150 calls for police service per year. He did not believe it would be a significant <br />cause for concern about crime in creating an amenity of this size. The calls for service <br />for a water park would be less than what the police department receives for an In-N-Out <br />Burger, two 7-Elevens or the local high schools. <br /> <br /> Mr. Brozosky asked if the 44 calls for police service last year were for the entire <br />park or only the water slide area? <br /> <br /> ChiefNeal said that the total number of police service calls for 2003 were for the <br />entire park. He pointed out that several of the traffic stops were probably on Stanley <br />Boulevard, which accounted for the way in which the calls for service are indexed. <br /> <br /> Chief Lapera pointed out that no alcohol has been allowed at the park for the last <br />11 years. He reminded everyone to remember that 5,000 to 8,000 people visit the <br />recreational area on a normal summer weekend and no alcohol is allowed. Alcohol is <br />allowed by permit only in the reservation picnic sites, which is the same provision that <br />Califomia Splash is asking for, and what has been in place already at the existing water <br />slide. A group may apply for a permit to consume alcohol only in the reserved picnic <br />site. EBRPD normally has officers on site during the summer months. Shadow Cliffs <br /> <br />Pleasanton City Council 21 03/16/04 <br />Minutes <br /> <br /> <br />