My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
CCMIN022004
City of Pleasanton
>
CITY CLERK
>
MINUTES
>
2000-2009
>
2004
>
CCMIN022004
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/17/2007 10:56:38 AM
Creation date
2/20/2004 11:23:09 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
MINUTES
DOCUMENT DATE
2/20/2004
DOCUMENT NO
CCMIN022004
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
31
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Mr. Swift noted that it is not clear what would be donated. It might be personal <br />items o£Mr. Luna or construction ora small cabinet display that would depict various <br />items and photographs of Randy Lure's career in Pleasanton. <br /> <br /> In response to Mr. Campbell's inquiry, Mr. Swift indicated that a descriptive <br />plaque would be displayed with various items donated. <br /> <br />Mayor Pico noted that a bust of Randy Lum could be displayed. <br /> <br /> Mr. Brozosky mentioned that the Parks and Recreation Commission had a <br />me~ing two days after Council's last meeting. The Commission was discussing the <br />City's current policy for naming public facilities as well as how to memorialize someone <br />in the community. At the last Council meeting, he requested that this agenda item be <br />held over, as his intent was to find out how the Parks and Recreation Commission would <br />proceed with the policy prior to Council making a decision in the matter. He believed <br />that paying tribute to a City employee was an area that Council had never considered. In <br />the past, Council has typically memorialized someone by asking for some type of art <br />donation, which involved the Civic Arts Commission, and/or naming a public facility in <br />someone's memory. He had the utmost respect for Mr. Lure, but believed that absent a <br />policy for this type ofmemorialization, it would set a precedent. He did not want to see <br />a "shrine," as he believed that was not what Mr. Lum's wishes would have been. He <br />wondered if active members of the community should be treated the same as those who <br />work for the City. He believed it was important to provide the same respect and <br />memorialization for active community members as Council would for City employees. <br /> <br /> Mr. Campbell believed it was important not to speak for Randy Lum or his family <br />as to what the family might want. <br /> <br /> Ms. Ayala did not want Council to get into the practice of naming facilities and <br />parks in memory of someone. According to the current Parks and Recreation <br />Commission staff report, it noted that the City's current Policy for Naming Public <br />Facilities did not provide for naming specific park elements, such as play areas, benches, <br />and athletic fields. The Parks and Recreation Commission deferred action on these <br />requests, and directed staffto review possible revisions to the overall policy. Since the <br />Parks and Recreation Comrrfission is currently reviewing and making recommendations <br />to Council on the City's Policy for Naming Public Facilities, she wondered ifth/s matter <br />should be incorporated into the overall policy. She was not opposed to establishing an <br />area within the golf course clubhouse to pay tribute to Randy Lum, but would like it <br />incorporated into the City's policy. <br /> <br /> Ms. McKeehan noted that City employees would not expect to be treated any <br />differently than any other member of the community. The attempt to pay tribute to <br />Randy Lum was the same type of memorialization that has been paid to others members <br />of the community, which has primarily been through art work in some form through <br />privately raised money. She noted there were a lot of ideas as to what kind of direction <br />this might take, but no decision had been made because the Council had not supported the <br /> <br />Pleasanton City Council 5 01/20/04 <br />Minutes <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.