CCMIN052003 - Laserfiche WebLink

It was moved by Mr. Campbell, seconded by Ms. Hosterman, to approve the Reimbursement Agreement with the City of Dublin for Final Design and Construction of the 1-580 at E! Charro/Fallon Road interchange; to appropriate $202,700 from the Stoneridge Drive Specific Plan for the final design work for the 1-580 at El Charro/Failon Road interchange project; and to authorize the City Manager to execute the agreement. The roll call vote was as follows: AYES: Councilmembers - Ayala, Brozosky, Campbell, Hosterman, and Mayor Pico NOES: None ABSENT: None ABSTAIN: None Item 6e Review of the East Bay Community Foundation's Hacienda Park Opportunities Study. (SR 03:144) Brian Swift presented the staff report. Ed Church, representing the East Bay Community Foundation, briefly reviewed the concept study and the designs that were presented to start discussions. The appendix sets forth comments from the presentation. He noted the report and appendices are available on-line at the following websites: http://www.hacienda.org/pdf/HaciendaBusinessParkConceptStudy.pdf and at http://www.hacienda.org/pdf/HaciendaBusinessParkConceptStudyAppendix.pdf. These are ideas for people to think about and to spark discussion. He acknowledged that more information is necessary and much more discussion before any plans take shape. A good starting point would be a manageable project close to BART. He also believed that the next step should be to develop urban design options with economic and traffic analyses of Hacienda Business Park near the BART station. This would be a public process and it is not anticipated that there would be City funds to pay for the process. He asked that City staffbe involved as liaisons for the process in order to insure that the planning process is integrated with the upcoming General Plan updates. Mr. Brozosky inquired if there would be a timeline for this process. Mr. Church said he would work with staff to develop that. First the business owners and BART representatives need to decide a potential area for consideration. There would then be a public process to review how many units, etc. Mr. Campbell thanked him for bringing this forward. It encourages the community to think outside the box to determine what to do in this area. He looked forward to this organization working with City staffto develop a good plan for the area. Ms. Hosterman echoed those sentiments. She was concerned about competing processes and suggested that the Livable Communities representatives be part of the General Plan Update process. Pleasanton City Council 23 05/20/03 Minutes