My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
CCMIN052003
City of Pleasanton
>
CITY CLERK
>
MINUTES
>
2000-2009
>
2003
>
CCMIN052003
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/17/2007 10:56:37 AM
Creation date
5/16/2003 9:43:59 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
MINUTES
DOCUMENT DATE
5/20/2003
DOCUMENT NO
CCMIN052003
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
35
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
worked diligently with the quarry owners to solve the infrastructure problems. This loop is just <br />the beginning. <br /> <br /> Mr. Brozosky asked if the loop was sufficient whether E1 Charro connects or not. He did <br />not want staffto come back and say more improvements had to be made to this ramp. <br /> <br /> Mr. Wilson said the loop was enough whether or not there is an extension of E1 Charro or <br />Stoneridge. The only change that will be necessary is that the over crossing would have to be <br />widened, but the loop would stay the same. The future development depends on how <br />development occurs and its timing. Staff's best estimate is within the next twenty years. <br /> <br /> Mr. Brozosky asked why it is taking Dublin so long to reimburse Pleasanton for the other <br />interchange improvements? <br /> <br /> Ms. McKeehan indicated Dublin has adopted a traffic fee to help reimburse Pleasanton <br />for the interchange improvements. If a developer constructs road improvements, it does not pay <br />a fee. Whenever a developer pays the traffic fee, it comes to Pleasanton as part of the <br />reimbursement. She noted that some of these agreements were negotiated later and initially <br />Dublin was not obligated to pay interest on the money. When the interchange improvements <br />were originally constructed, there was no development occurring in Dublin and from their <br />perspective Pleasanton was getting a decade of revenue from the development in Pleasanton and <br />we needed the interchanges to do that. It is now Dublin's time for development and it is <br />financing the major portion of the E1 Charro interchange and they are reimbursing us for the <br />prior improvements. It will just take a while, depending on the development of east Dublin. <br /> <br /> Mayor Pico said the agenda item is for approval of only $202,700 from the Stoneridge <br />Drive Specific Plan fund. This is not related to the other interchanges, Dublin is making <br />payments to Pleasanton, and he did not want to jeopardize relationships with Dublin. He further <br />explained that the reimbursements from Dublin go back to the North Pleasanton Improvement <br />District, not to the City of Pleasanton. <br /> <br /> Ms. Ayala asked what the total amount for the loop would be and whether there was <br />interest on this loan? <br /> <br /> Mr. Wilson said the $202,700 is for the design portion. The construction costs will be <br />determined once the design is complete. The estimated total cost of the agreement is less than $1 <br />million. Pleasanton is advancing the cost for the design and once the bids come in for the actual <br />construction, Pleasanton would pay those costs. This is not a loan. <br /> <br />Pleasanton City Council 22 05/20/03 <br />Minutes <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.