CCMIN052003 - Laserfiche WebLink

residences not be created over the Adams' property. Action is required at this meeting because the final map cannot be recorded without it and that would delay the financial transactions for the core property owners. They have been very patient to this point, but he has received numerous calls inquiring why the map has not been recorded. Mr. Roush believed the action was to the benefit of the Alisal and Happy Valley residents because it would preclude the residents of the 37 lots from having access to Alisal and Happy Valley once the bypass road is constructed. Mr. Brozosky asked who paid for the road and whether the benefactors were the owners of the 37 lots? Mr. Roush said the City is paying for the road but the core property owners are paying for a portion of the road and the infrastructure. Mr. Campbell asked who was the developer of the 37 lots? Mr. Roush said there were several, including Black Mountain, the Jordans, the Mannings, etc. Mr. Campbell asked if there had been difficulties with some of the developers not paying fees? Mr. Roush said there had been a series of negotiations regarding the Memorandum of Understanding that the Council approved last year. Ms. McKeehan indicated once the annexation did not take place, Black Mountain has not been willing to provide funding for Happy Valley infrastructure. However, the core property owners have been waiting for a long time and are trying to secure financing when the rates are good. Mayor Pico invited public comment. Vanessa Kawaihau, 871 Sycamore Road, referred to the emergency vehicle access (EVA) known as Westerly Road in the Happy Valley Specific Plan and now referred to as Westbridge Lane. She indicated the City would file a quiet title action to ascertain ownership and felt this was unnecessary. The City should work with the surrounding owners. She wanted to know what the attorneys for the Happy Valley residents would say to the City's proposed action. She felt Westbridge Lane only provided temporary access to the golf course and does not assist in getting a bypass road. She felt this was a flagrant disregard for the Happy Valley community because no notice was provided to them. She believed this would lead to permanent use of Happy Valley Road, Alisal Street, and Sycamore Road for the golf course and future development. She wanted the Alisal Improvement Club to have the opportunity to discuss this with its lawyers. Kevin Close, 871 Sycamore Road, said he has been asking for months how the City would gain access to its golf course development. He received a letter today outlining the status of the bypass road. He noted the Spotomo plan submittal package is expected to consist of the environmental impact report, Happy Valley Specific Plan amendment applications, etc. He Pleasanton City Council 10 05/20/03 Minutes