Laserfiche WebLink
adjust. If this nine month period is given, the City can deliver a system that performs just <br />as it would have if surface streets would have been metered. <br /> Ms. Ayala asked if the statement in the report of the combined effects of these <br />two systems, the off ramp metering and the on ramp metering, would reduce congestion <br />and delay along the freeway, and also reducing cut through and cross town traffic on City <br />surface streets. The piece of it that we are not going to be eliminating is the cut through <br />and the cross town traffic on City streets. We are still going to have that incoming and <br />because Santa Rita is the furthest point, that is where it is going to back up. We are still <br />going to have the meters turned on. She asked if Mr. Knowles is very comfortable that <br />without doing both of those movements that we are not going to create back up on Santa <br />Rita Road. <br /> <br /> Mr. Knowles said the part of Santa Rim that already backs up will definitely be <br />documented using existing ques and existing delays because we do not want to go <br />through the process in nine months of saying, "Remember the good old days before <br />metering, before traffic ever back uped on Santa Rita." That is not the current case. It <br />already backed up. The City is going to document all of the existing conditions and <br />existing delays and have good measurements of what the net effect is of having the <br />metering. In terms of that combined effect, it is tree that in the last staff report we did <br />say the combined improved effect of Sunol metering and on-ramp metering was greater <br />than the sum of either one by itself. The City will still see benefits, but the benefits <br />would have been greater with that extra delay induced on Sunol. This was enough to <br />really tip the scales in keeping more people on the freeway. What the City will still see is <br />hundreds of cars less on surface streets. It just won't be quite as significant as it would <br />have been if we had continued the Sunol metering. <br /> <br /> Ms. Ayala said the City would see fewer cars on surface streets because you are <br />absolutely convinced that keeping the freeway traffic on the freeway at 1-680 and <br />merging into 1-580 that somehow that is going to be less traffic there. <br /> <br /> Mr. Knowles said there would not be less traffic, but functionally more capacity, <br />so the City can physically move more traffic on the existing roadways. <br /> <br /> James Paxson, 4473 Willow Road, Suite 105, said he did not have an opportunity <br />to write some comments to the Council but he wanted Council to know that as a <br />representative of the Business Park the proposal by staff has their full support. He felt <br />that one of the things everyone is very conscious of is the need to maintain capacity for <br />the business park. He fully believes the staff has made a very compelling argument that <br />we will see that as a result of this process. He urged Council to adopt the proposal <br />presented. <br /> <br /> Ms. Ayala said the model is presented with West Las Positas out, with ramp <br />metering off Sunol, Bernal and Stoneridge Drives and on ramp metering at Hopyard, <br />Hacienda and Santa Rita Roads. Now things will simply flow? <br /> <br />Pleasanton City Council 21 <br />Minutes <br /> <br />04/01/03 <br /> <br /> <br />