My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
CCMIN030403
City of Pleasanton
>
CITY CLERK
>
MINUTES
>
2000-2009
>
2003
>
CCMIN030403
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/17/2007 10:56:36 AM
Creation date
3/27/2003 3:18:39 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
MINUTES
DOCUMENT DATE
3/4/2003
DOCUMENT NO
CCMIN030403
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
24
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Mr. Campbell asked about Commissions' making or taking political stances. The <br />Housing Commission's recent stand on Measure V is used as a recent example. Does the <br />Housing Commission have to have the item on its agenda in order for that to take place? <br /> <br />Ms. McKeehan said that as a Commission, it would have to be on the agenda. <br /> <br />Mr. Campbell asked if staff was asked to prepare a staff report. <br /> <br /> Ms. McKeehan said that in this case it did happen, but this was not just related to <br />Measure V. The situation has occurred before. This is the most recent example. Staff <br />replied that they could not do it, because we do not weigh in on political activities. She <br />said Council has never taken a position on whether a Commission body could take a <br />position or not. Staff does not get involved in elections. <br /> <br /> Mr. Campbell said it was on the agenda and the Commission voted to take a <br />position, but it was not supplied a staff report written by any staff member. He had no <br />problem with Commissions' taking a stance on political issues, but if staff is <br />uncomfortable preparing reports and do not want to be involved with it, it can happen just <br />the way it recently happened. A commission can take a position but will not have any <br />assistance from staff for the discussion. Staff would stay on the sideline. He felt that <br />people on the Commissions are making an educated guess on this, and this is simply <br />another way for the public to get a gauge of what people think. Even though the <br />Commission makes a recommendation, ultimately the people will make their own <br />decision on how they will vote. It is just another way to educate the public about a <br />particular issue. <br /> <br /> Ms. Ayala said the Council could advise the Commissions to not take a stance, <br />but staff has already done that, and the Commission did it anyway. What is going to be <br />the difference if it is the Council advising them not to do it or if it is staff saying the same <br />thing. <br /> <br /> Ms. McKeehan said all of the commissions were advisory with the exception of <br />the Planning Commission which does have some final decision making authority. The <br />rest of the commission actions are advisory to the Council. <br /> <br />The Mayor asked for public comment. <br /> <br /> Vanessa Kawaihau, 871 Sycamore Road, said it is questionable as to whether or <br />not a person should be able to vote twice on an item and, especially if it leads to some <br />sort of policy. She did not think commissions should be stifled because they are advising <br />Council. Sometimes the Council misses what is necessary for the community. She did <br />not feel Council should take the ability or the right for a sitting commission to take a <br />position on any particular measure or other political item. <br /> <br />Pleasanton City Council 19 03/04/03 <br />Minutes <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.